Author Archives: Murad

London slow to become the ‘electric car capital of Europe’

Boris Johnson‘s plan to make London the electric car capital of Europe is making "slow" progress, with a promise to put thousands of the cars on the city’s roads likely to take centuries to achieve at current rates, according to a report published on Wednesday.

Nearly three years ago, the mayor of London told fellow international mayors in Seoul that he would ensure 100,000 electric vehicles were in London "as soon as possible". But the London assembly’s environment committee found that since Johnson’s announcement, only 588 extra electric cars were registered in London. There are now 2,313 electric cars in the capital, just 0.08% of the city’s total 3m cars.

<iframe allowfullscreen=”” height=”234″ width=”460″ frameborder=”0″ src=”http://www.youtube.com/embed/4thb3FhP78A”></iframe>Murad Qureshi on Boris Johnson’s progress on electric vehicles

While the authors said there has been "visible progress" since Johnson’s electric vehicle delivery plan in 2009, they warned that progress has been poor on charging points and the GLA’s own car fleet.

The mayor set a target of 1,000 of the authority’s cars being electric by 2015, but only "around 49" ““ the GLA failed to give a precise figure ““ are currently electric. On charging points, there are now 400 across London, with a target of 1,300 by next year, with most of those in Johnson’s Source London charging network, launched last year. But an earlier target of 25,000 by 2015 has already been dropped, the report notes.

Murad Qureshi, the committee’s chair, said: "Currently progress is slow and we are concerned that it could take many years before we see any environmental benefits from the mayor’s ambitious plans. If the mayor wants to encourage more Londoners to drive electric vehicles, he must demonstrate that the charging network is adequate and fits with the way people will actually charge their vehicles. It is unclear at the moment whether it is delivering value for money given the sums already spent on it."

The report made clear that it welcomed electric cars and that they could deliver environmental benefits. If take-up of private electric cars in London failed, the committee said, Johnson should consider adopting a similar model to Paris’ Autolib electric car hire scheme, which opened last year.

The committee monitors the mayor’s environmental programmes, and comprises two Labour assembly members, one Green, one Liberal Democrat and three Conservatives.

“¢ Get the Guardian’s environment news on your iPhone with our new app. You can also join us on Twitter, Facebook and Google+

Click here to view article

China attracted to investment in London

Hope this is not a bad omen for Chinese investment into Thames Water

 

Gung Hey Fat Choy to you all.

As we have been  celebrating the New Chinese Year of the Dragon in the West End today at another end of the West End, we have just recovered from Oxford St flooding chaos.  How these two events related?

Well now the Chinese are investing in our infrastructure with the purchase of 8.7 per cent of Thames Water holding company by China Investment Company (CIC), l just hope Oxford St flood is not a bad omen. As its part of water and sewage infrastructure that Thames Water has in London that the Chinese have just brought a major stake into.

This all apparently happened soon after a trip before Davos by George Osborne, kowtowing in Beijing to sell our infrastructural projects to Chinese authorities who seating on huge trade balances and saving of their own people are looking at investments around the globe.  So not surprisingly the Chancellor hailed China’s state-run investment fund’s decision to buy a share of Thames Water as a ” vote of confidence in Britain” as a place to invest, so soon after his trip. The reality is that the CIC stake in Thames Water had been  negotiated over many months but it made for a good news story in the FT weekend for the Chancellor, last weekend.  

 Who knows what else had been offered to the Chinese for them to invest into our infrastructure but l won’t be surprised if HS2 and even Boris fantasy island had been as well. HS2 would clearly be something the Chinese authority would feel comfortable investing into with their vast experience of delivering similar schemes on mainland China. It may well be that the Chinese are in the future more then just the banker of such future ventures but actually delivering and running these services, once its got the planning approvals.

So we certainly have to watch this space but its clear as hell the Chinese are here to stay for the long run with such investments and its clearly just an indication of the future sharpe of things to come, with their preference for low risk physical assets that carry steady returns.  

Churches wot done it – Bless them!

Westminster church goers said NO to proposed weekend & evening parking charges

 
Following Cllr Colin Barrow’s tip toeing exit from office as leader of Westminster Council, rumours are rife about who can actually lay claim for his departure.
 

Very few council leaders are subjected to the sort of onslaught which beset him following the fiasco over the proposed parking charges in the West End. Pretty much everyone, cross party, locally and nationally were against the idea.  I’m sure even the Pope would have had a word or two to say if asked; which brings me nicely to my point.   Because, contrary to popular belief it was not the well run Evening Standard or the flurry of other media campaigns which dealt the final blow. I’m pretty clear it was the churches. Had the ex council leader not messed with the Sunday worshippers, then he may just have got away with it. Thank goodness he didn’t!

This whole episode reminded me of my days as a councillor a few years back when I attended a centennial dinner to mark the formation of the City of Westminster. During the event, I noticed a very strong clergy presence from places like Westminster Abbey & Westminster Cathedral. When l asked why this was, l was politely told that before the Council came into being, the churches ran things for 400-500 years in the City. You only have to look at the primary schools in the borough, to be reminded of their past roles and continuing presence. So, well before the local press, businesses and celebrities jumped on the evening and weekend parking band wagon, it was the churches and their congregations which mobilised to fight the cause.

If there is a lesson to be learned for local politicians, it is, don’t dare to take on the churches on such matters although the whole of Westminster has much to thank them for; bless them.

Vote brings Boris bikes close to the Palace of Westminster

Westminster City Council’s planning committee last night (Thursday) backed an application by Transport for London to build a station in Abingdon Street at the junction with Great College Street.

The idea had attracted support from some enthusiastic MPs and the Conservative Party deputy chairman Michael Fallon, who said it was “frustrating” that there had been no bike hire docking points built close to Whitehall and the Palace of Westminster.

Any MPs wishing to travel by the Barclays Cycle Hire vehicles have had to walk for at least 10 minutes to racks in Horseferry Road.

The committee gave unanimous backing to the plan, against the advice of city council officers.

In 2010 Labour London Assembly member Murad Qureshi criticised the council for having rejected more docking stations than any other authority but Robert Davis, cabinet member for the built environment, said: “The only reason that we may have refused more applications than elsewhere is because a greater number of applications were made to us”.

Click here to view article

Coup attempt foiled in Dhaka,Bangladesh.

Just when we thought Bangladesh was safe from the military coming back into power as it clearly appears to be in Pakistan, we hear confirmation of the rumours that have been going around over the recent christmas break of a coup attempt.

Senior military officials made their annoucement today and ably reported by Bdnews24.com that middle ranking officers attempted a coup of the civilian government of Shiekh Hasina, Awami League on the 22nd of December.  Many of them were members of the banned Hizb ut-Tahrir Islamist group. We also hear allegation of non-resident Bangladeshi (NRB) involvement as well by the senior officers of the Bangladesh army. More strangely, a bizarre facebook page exists amongst the middle  ranking officers threatening to bring change very soon. To make things more tense politically, it was noted that Khalida Zia of the BNP opposition during recent demonstrations had made suggestions that army officers should be freed from arrests and court marshall.

It appears Bangladesh can never sleep quietly from the threat of mutineers, assasins & war criminals.

 

Crossrail lorries to cause nuisance when alternative exists

Schedule 7 proposed lorry routes

On the last working day before the Christmas break, Crossrail’s planning submission for additional lorry movements was accepted by the City of Westminster for consideration in the new year. 

 You can imagine the potential nuisance a successful application would be for locals.  The application will result in more noise, poorer air quality and not least, a risk to safety in residential neighbourhoods in North Paddington (as well as Harlesden); South West of Paddington station; Notting Hill Gate & Bayswater with up to 70 lorry movements passing daily through these neighbourhoods.  All this when Westminster Council were originally led to believe that the scheme would deliver the tunnel lining being constructed at Old Oak Common to the Westbourne Park worksite by rail  as they are barely two and half miles apart.  This latest application will simply add to the complaints already being voiced by residents about the lorry movements onto the worksite for the tarmac plant.  
 
Furthermore, the proposals will mean that on the northern most route along the Harrow Road, lorries would have to turn right where currently only buses are permitted at the junction of Harrow Rd and Great Western Road.  This is already a busy junction for residents and local businesses and therefore, will do little to alleviate existing concerns over safety, as well as adding noise and air pollution along the Harrow Rd shopping parade.  There are also concerns about using the Bridge, which many consider is not up to taking such heavy loads.  Also, the application makes way for the legitimate argument which is, if heavy goods vehicles are permitted to turn right at the this junction, then why continue a ban for smaller vehicles?  Finally, there is the southern most proposed route along the whole length of Ladbroke Grove then around into Bayswater along very tight residential roads like Chepstow Road all of which makes this application unsuitable for the area and a burden on local residents.
 
An alternative does exist between Old Oak Common and Royal Oak portal for transportation via water freight.  We have a canal link between the two sites which means you could move the tunnel linings/segments by canal without causing the disturbance which lorries will cause. It is something Crossrail have considered when they commissioned a feasibility study,  however, since letting the contract to Bam Ferrovial Kier (BFK), Crossrail have seemingly backed away from its own suggestion of how this could be achieved.    
 
In the meantime, in another part of London (as shown below), it has already been demonstrated that using the canals to move tunnel lining/segments is extremly plausible, practical and a huge benefit  for the local neighbourhood. 
  
 
If Crossrail are serious about minimising the disruption to local residents which its additional lorries will create in the North Paddington & Notting Hill Gate neighbourhood, then it should consider the water freight option in earnest before beginning the main tunnelling works.
 
Finally,you can make your views known to this application by visiting this link.
 

Mayor’s air quality plans “too little, too late”

More than three years since he became Mayor, Boris Johnson is still tinkering at the edges of a growing public health issue. He has:

  • Delayed phase III of the low emission zone by fifteen months
  • Imposed an age limit on black cabs that is actually higher than most cabbies choose to replace their vehicle currently
  • Decided three years into his mayoralty to encourage drivers not to leave their engines idling.

Labour’s environment spokesman on the London Assembly, Murad Qureshi, said "The Mayor is seeking praise for his latest air quality measures, but yet again they are too little, too late, from a Mayor who just doesn’t seem to understand the problem, and who seems more concerned with a shiny press release than in tackling this devastating public health time bomb."

Murad added:

"This is far too late in the day and while the mayor has dithered London’s air has remained lethal. No one has benefited from this delay but everyone has suffered. More people are dying from London’s pollution than are killed in road accidents – this can’t continue in a supposedly advanced capital city."

Ends

Notes

For further information please contact Alison Marcroft on 0207 983 4363

Murad Qureshi is a London-wide Assembly Member and the Labour environment spokesperson on the Assembly.

Back to the Future with fares

 

As l joined Ken’s campaign for a “Fare Deal” this morning, I was reminded of his “Fares Fair” initiative back in 1981.   I for one, benefitted from Ken’s revolutionary campaign back in the early 80s to significantly reduce the cost of travel.  The deal was to introduce a very welcome 30% reduction in tubes fares, enabling me to travel to school by tube for the first time.  At that time, there was spare capacity on the tube, even at peak times.
 
In the early 80s, it was about getting “bottoms on seats” and the scheme proved to be a highly successful policy, increasing public transport use across the day and reducing car use.  The scheme cut all bus and underground fares by a third, introduced the “Just the Ticket” initiative which brought about the now indispensable travel card.  It also introduced the concept of off peak fare travel.  Unfortunately, a legal challenge by Bromley Council culminating in a House of Lords ruling put a stop to the initiative.  The premise for the challenge was that areas, like Bromley with no underground service would only be able to take advantage of the resulting reduction in bus fares, not underground fares, therefore the Fares Fair policy was deemed not so fair for Bromley rates payers.
 
This time the Fare Deal campaign is just as radical but for different reasons.   There are of course obvious parallels to be drawn between  now and then, such as another Tory administration, painful cuts, rising inflation and unemployment.  However, this time Ken’s proposal to cut fares by 7% and freeze them next year is necessary in order to reverse an untenable above inflation rise in public transport costs imposed by the current London administration.  The motivation is no longer to encourage commuters to use public transport as they continue to be torn between spiralling fuel prices and rocketing fare increases.  Any public transport system has a captive audience right now.  Ken’s scheme is radical because it dares to suggest the unthinkable in today’s climate, coming against a tsunami of austerity measures and daring to suggest another way.  As passengers continue to be forced fed the idea that there is no alternative but to keep piling on the pressure, forcing them to pay more and more for their travel, Ken has come up with a credible and workable alternative.  This, don’t forget is from the man who brought us the travel card and off peak fare travel, this should count for a lot.
 
Finally, passengers can be assured that the likes of Bromley council won’t be able to challenge Ken’s “Fare Deal” in the same way Ken’s previous scheme  was, because, this time, the whole of London stands to benefit ,  not just those who have access to tubes in their boroughs. So rest assure that when Ken gets in, his Fare Deal initiative won’t be fought out in the courts in the same way.

Fire chair hand-bagged by the Mayor

At the last full authority meeting of the London Fire Brigade, l asked the chairman Cllr Brian Coleman AM whether he is planning to privatise the fire service, given he is on record as saying all public services could be undertaken by the private sector.  In my verbal supplementary we had an exchange which strongly suggested the chairman is not for turning from his ideological position, to use his own chosen words.

So it was with much interest that l watched the exchange between the mayor and a fellow Assembly member Darren Johnson at the very end of the questioning of the mayor on this same subject at the last Mayors Question Time ( MQT ). The mayor gave a considered response to the question on privatisation of fire service and clearing stated l do not want to privatise the fire service.

So it appears that the political boss of the fire chief of  london has completely different views from the mayor on the privatising of the fire service. So the mayor has clearly hand bagged the Fire chief from his ideological stance as an end of year reminder of whos the boss.  

 

 

 

Has the Mayor fallen out of love with Thames Water?

 

Are Thames Water reducing leaks & sewage flooding enough?

Are Thames Water reducing leaks & sewage flooding enough?

 

With a drought order issued for the South-East today, it made me think about the exchange of views at the last MQT  (pages 42-44) when the Mayor himself was asked by Mike Tuffrey AM about what he was doing to reduce water demand in London.

Interestingly, the Mayor emphasised the problem of leakages and appeared to be complaining bitterly about Thames Water’s road works not actually dealing with the root of the problem.  He suggested that they were merely repairing instead of replacing them, which is contrary to what Thames Water’s seemed to be advertising along the roads where the works are taking place.

The Mayor also suggested the need to “have a discussion” with The Officer of Water Services (OFWAT), their regulator, as well as the possibilty of appointing a Water Commissioner to deal with the problem.  Intriguely enough, the Mayor began his political term with approving their desalination plant in Beckton which was a source of grief for Ken. Both of them have been strong supporters of the Thames Tideway Tunnel.  However, the sentiments expressed at the last MQT indicate that he had now most definitely fallen out of love with Thames Water and now possibly even at war with them over the issue of road works at least.