London wide Assembly Member Murad Qureshi has hit out at the Mayor of London’s “truly appalling record on tackling air pollution” after new research from Clean Air London estimated that by 2020 the number of Londoners dying prematurely as a result air pollution will rise to 6,851 per year. Clean Air London also suggested that the number of people currently dying as a result of air pollution could be as high as 7,500 a year in London. Commenting on the research Murad Qureshi described the figures as ‘catastrophic’ saying they revealed just how bad the silent killer of air pollution had got. The data which was released this week by Simon Birkett of Clean Air London is drawn from a study commissioned by the Mayor as part of the Health Impact Assessment for the proposed Ultra Low Emission Zone and states that current estimates suggest 6,851 Londoners could die each year by 2020 as a consequence of the capital’s air pollution problem. Prior to this study, it was believed that 4,300 lives were prematurely lost in the capital each year as a result of air pollution. The new figures include analysis of the impact of additional categories of pollutants which are known to be detrimental to public health.

In the summer the Mayor provided more details on an Ultra-Low Emission Zone but the scheme would only cover a small area of London and won’t come into effect until after 2020. Murad Qureshi has welcomed the scheme but said it doesn’t go far enough. Murad Qureshi AM, Labour London wide Assembly Member, said:

“For years we have known air pollution is the capital’s silent killer, now we know just how bad the situation has got. For 4,300 Londoners to prematurely die as a consequence of air pollution was shocking enough. The fact that the real figure is nearer 7,500 it is truly catastrophic. “Boris Johnson has a truly appalling record on tackling air pollution. It has taken six years for him to wake up to the scale of the capital’s air quality crisis. His proposals for an Ultra-Low Emission Zone are not only unambitious but are designed to leave the problem for his successor to grapple with. “Londoners want to see the proposed Ultra Low Emission Zone made bigger, stronger and more effective. Quite frankly, if these new figures don’t cause the Mayor to wake up and take action, nothing will”. ENDS Notes

– The latest Clean Air London research, published this week, is available at : http://cleanair.london/sources/mayor-publishes-health-study-revealing-deaths-attributable-to-no2/

– Murad Qureshi is a Labour London wide Assembly Member and is also the environment spokesperson for the London Assembly Labour Group.

Devastating proposals for 90% cuts to education programmes run by City Hall have been condemned as ‘disgraceful’ by Labour London Assembly Member Murad Qureshi. The cuts to projects which support young people to stay on at school, develop workplace skills and increase the number of apprenticeships were revealed in a leaked document which admitted they would disproportionately hit the most vulnerable groups of young people.

In a heated exchange at last week’s Mayor’s Question Time Boris Johnson refused to rule out the 90% cuts and resorted to telling Assembly Members to “stick it up your…” The leaked report showed that if the proposals were agreed funding for youth and education projects would drop from £22.6m in 2014/15 to just £2.3m by 2016/171. Certain projects such as those to support apprenticeships and get into work would be axed entirely with zero funding planned for 2016/17 despite the number of people starting apprenticeships falling for the last two years.

Murad Qureshi AM, Labour London wide Assembly Member, said:

“The fact that Boris Johnson would even consider cuts of 90% to schemes designed to help some of Westminster’s most vulnerable young people tells you everything you need to know about his cavalier and uncaring approach to governing.

“Projects to increase apprenticeships and support for people to stay on at school may seem like optional extras to Boris Johnson but for many young people they make a world of difference, helping them to get on in an increasingly competitive jobs market.

“Boris Johnson may be focused on his next job in Parliament but he has a duty to responsibly see out his term working for all Londoners. These cuts however suggest more a policy of scorched earth, drastically cutting funding to important projects and leaving his successor to pick up the pieces.”

ENDS

Notes                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    

• BBC London coverage of the MQT meeting and leaked report showing 90% cuts to youth and education budgets is available here.
  • The number of apprenticeships started by region:

Source: Breakdown by geography, equality & diversity and sector subject area: starts 2013/14

• Murad Qureshi is a Labour London wide Assembly Member

Labour London wide Assembly Member Murad Qureshi is calling for Westminster residents to have their say about the key issues facing the capital by completing his annual Living in London survey. The survey, which seeks resident views on issues such as the rising costs of utility bills and transport fares, will run until the New Year and helps shape Murad’s work over the coming year. 

The survey features a wide range of questions on issues such as fare rises, the cost of living and the confidence in the emergency services since the Mayor’s cuts to police officer numbers and fire stations in the capital. 

Murad Qureshi said he feared residents in Westminster were suffering as a result of the continuing squeeze on living standards and that the survey would help to illustrate the impact Government and Mayoral policies are having on people in the borough.

Labour London wide Assembly Member Murad Qureshi said:

“The Living in London survey gives residents in Westminster a chance to have their say on the key issues facing the capital. Over the last year we have seen inflation busting fare rises, reductions in the number of neighbourhood police officers and soaring rents and house prices; it’s only right that Boris Johnson is made to hear the views of ordinary Londoners on the impact his policies are having.

“The views shared in this survey will help to illustrate the impact of the Mayor’s policies and to ensure the he doesn’t get away with yet more broken promises. It will also give my colleagues and I the vital information we need to help shape our priorities for the coming year.

“I strongly encourage residents to take part in this survey and let me know their experiences of Living in London over the past year. We are delivering the surveys to residents but they can also be filled out online. The more people complete the survey the stronger our voice will be pressing the Mayor for policies which help rather than hinder residents in Westminster.

ENDS

Notes

–          Murad Qureshi is a Labour London wide Assembly Member.

-The 2014 Living in London survey can be accessed at: bit.ly/londonlife

–          Alternatively there are a limited number of hardcopy surveys which will be delivered but if residents do not receive one but would like to complete a hardcopy survey, they can contact Murad Qureshi AM by emailing murad.qureshi@london.gov.uk and a copy will be sent to them.

It was good to meet up with the New Yorkers demanding better pay and terms of employment in the fast food sector in their $15 per hour campaign to improve their pay as they came through London. I went long to show some solidarity with them, more importantly be inspired by them and thank the Bakers Food & Allied Workers Union for bringing them over the pond to our shores.

It is quite clear that whilst capital has gone global for sometime particularly in sectors like fast food with  companies like McDonalds, KFC & Burger King, leading lights in the globalisation of capital, labour needs to do so as well. Thats why we can be inspired by the efforts of our colleagues in New York, as fast food workers demand fair pay in the United States. Convincing oneself as well as colleagues across the United States when its a continent in itself, to strike for better pay is no small task and there is much to learn in a sector with little Trade Union activity at all.

Its also good that the Observer noted their challenge as they went through the UK in its edition today.

So lets start preparing for 15th of April, next year.

In a FT exclusive, we hear for the first time that the Mayor during his recent book promotion tour in New York is being pursued by the IRS for outstanding taxes due to the US state. He is a New Yorker by birth having left the country at five for the UK and proudly holds their passport.

It is deeply ironic that while the US embassy in London owes several million pounds in outstanding congestion charge, its taxman are chasing the Mayor for outstanding taxes.

Saying this, you have to ask also does he not talk to other Americans? As this is a big topic for Americans who live aboard so its inconcievable he did not know. The IRS is after US “citizens” all over the world. Even if you left when you were a month old or if your parents or parent was born in the USA and you were not,  you are on the IRS radar screen. No other country to my knowledge is trying to tax what it defines as a citizen even thought that citizen has never earned a dime in the USA. Canadian banks, for example,have been coerced into divulging information on accounts they hold belonging to these “citizens”. …if these banks have US operations.

If l were him, l would “jack in” my US passport.

Analysis by Labour London Assembly Member Qureshi has shown that fire brigade response times have gone up in over 370 London wards since the Mayor forced through the closure of 10 London fire stations in January this year. Average response times for London have increased from 5:18 to 5:30 for the first fire engine response with the second response time also increasing from 6:28 to 6:51.

Initial analysis of the figures provided to Assembly Members show that Londoners in 14 Westminster wards now have to wait more than the six minute target time before help arrives with response times increasing by up to 6.18 minutes in some areas. In Westminster, Knightsbridge and Westminster fire stations was closed in January resulting in the loss of 1 fire engine. In total response times have increased in 14 Westminster wards.

Since the fire station closures in January which also saw 14 fire engines removed from service, a total of 37 London wards have seen first response times increase by over a minute compared with 2012/13 data. Murad Qureshi AM said the number of areas where response times have increased shows that despite assurances from the Mayor, his cuts to the fire service have increased the threat to public safety.

The figures also include areas where 13 additional fire engines have been removed in order to cover potential strikes, further degrading response times. Murad Qureshi AM called for these appliances to be returned outside of strike periods to ensure full cover across the capital.

London Assembly Labour Group Fire Spokesperson, Fiona Twycross AM, said:

“Fires can take hold in seconds that’s why any increase in response times can be so dangerous. As a result of Boris Johnson’s decision to close ten fire stations and with the removal of a further 13 fire engines, even when they are not needed for strike cover, we have seen response times rise in over half of the capital’s wards including significant increases in Westminster.

“Londoners will be deeply concerned that since the closures it could take significantly longer for a fire engine to reach their home. These latest figures show is that in most of London’s wards it will now take longer to get to fires than it did last year that is unacceptable.”

“The Mayor has an important duty to protect the public. He needs to ask himself whether closing ten fire stations and removing 27 fire engines is really the best way to achieve that. Given the jump in response times since the fire station closures, it is very fortunate that we have not seen an increase in serious incidents as a result.”

ENDS

Notes 

• A breakdown of the latest London Fire Service response time data can be found here.
• In January the Mayor forced through the closure of ten London fire stations against widespread opposition: Belsize, Bow, Clerkenwell, Downham, Kingsland, Knightsbridge, Silvertown, Southwark, Westminster and Woolwich. As part of these closures 14 fire appliances were removed from service. Subsequently, a further 13 fire appliances have been removed from service to act as cover in case of any strike action.
• Murad Qureshi AM is a Labour London wide Assembly Member.

At a site visit to Old Oak Common & Park Royal for London Assembly members last week we saw for the first time, the area that the Mayor wants to cover in his Mayoral Development Corporation ( MDC ) proposal for this part of North West London.

Whilst I could clearly see the need for something to be done in Old Oak Common predominantly in the London Borough Hammersmith & Fulham, l was not totally convinced of Park Royal inclusion into the MDC as it appeared to be a fairly prosperous area with even Lebanese restaurants and it even had its own traffic jams, a sign of success if ever l saw one!

As for Old Oak Common, both the rail yards and the land immediate North of the canal clearly needs something done. It felt and looked comparably to how Stratford looked when the Olympic bid was won in 2005. So clearly a vehicle like the Olympic MDC would help transform this derelict part of W12.

Strategically for London, its also the best place to have the terminus for HS2 in London. It has many rail and tube connections to allow many passengers of the HS2 from the North to get to the rest of London including the new Crossrail operation from 2018 and Overground, Central, Piccadilly and Bakerloo line. It would also save Camden from the works going into Euston….

So look out for the 17th of December plenary for the formation of the MDC where the Mayor will need 2/3 res  majority for permission to set up another Mayoral Development Corporation (MDC). In the meantime, the local authorities in the proposed MDC, thats Hammersmith & Fulham, Brent & Ealing will need to be satisfied its the right type of vehicle to regenerate part of W12.

At yesterday’s Housing Committee we were presented a presentation explaining to us what Housing Zones were all about, but l was immediately intrigued by the first slide above.  This shows were most of the homes that the Mayor has started with his housing investment budgets have emerged from over the period 2011-13. Quite clearly the Mayor has been dependent on boroughs like Tower Hamlets to produce over 3,901 starts to deliver his programme commitments to the electorate. This while other boroughs like the City of Westminster have not been able to produce more than 400 starts for the Mayor. Now given the former is a political ally of  Boris Johnson it is some what surprising what little assistance City of Westminster has been to the Mayor. While in contrast a borough like Tower Hamlets, has helped start almost 10 times as many starts for the Mayor than City of Westminster yet is certainly not allied with him politically.

It was explained to us how these zones were bidder for by boroughs as £ 200m allocation from GLA housing capital budgets were kept aside for it while the bids were judged for their planning, financial & “new model” packages. The successful bids came from boroughs like Ealing, Enfield, Haringey, Tower Hamlets and Wandsworth boroughs already helping to deliver the Mayors programme. But alas not in boroughs like Richmond, Kingston, Harrow, Sutton which were not helping in the first place. Surely bids should have been encouraged and made in those poorly performing boroughs?

Maybe the Mayor should ask boroughs like City of Westminster to make applications for Housing Zones? But as we know thats not likely from his allies along Victoria St, SW1 as we can see from diagram above!

Peabody Trust housing in Southwark

A petition has been received this week at City Hall from tenants calling on their housing association Peabody to stop escalating their rents, which have risen by 36% in just four years. Peabody bought four estates housing keyworkers across London in 2011 from the Crown Estate. The estates in Victoria Park in Hackney and Tower Hamlets, Cumberland Market in Camden, Milbank in Westminster and Lee Green in Lewisham contain 1,200 homes. 

Despite assurances at the time of the sale that rents would be kept affordable, since 2011 rents have increased so someone who paid £650 per month now has to pay £884 a month. At a time of stagnant wage rises and increases in the cost of living residents simply cannot afford this. The petition signed by over 1,000 people calls for a meeting with senior staff at Peabody, a 12 month freeze on further increases and a review of their rent policy.

Murad Qureshi AM, Labour London wide Assembly Member said: 

“It is unacceptable for Peabody to raise rents resulting in yet more key workers in London being priced out of the city while at the same time their accounts show a surplus of £291m for the year 2013/14.  This is more than 10 times the amount of surplus they recorded last year.  The term affordable bears little relation to reality.

“Residents have been expected to find an extra £234 a month over four years. How are people supposed to be able to find this money and be left with enough to afford essentials like heating, food and transport costs? Both Peabody and the Mayor of London speak about ‘affordable’ housing, but residents are being really squeezed by ever rising rents. These increases are simply not sustainable’’.

ENDS 

Notes 

Murad Qureshi AM is a Labour London wide Assembly Member.

Tom Copley AM received the petition at City Hall yesterday.  Tom Copley is a Labour London wide Assembly Member.

Labour London wide Assembly Member Murad Qureshi last week voted to call on the Mayor of London Boris Johnson to rethink his approach to tall buildings on London’s skyline after it was revealed that Westminster has 3 new skyscrapers in the development pipeline and a total of 236 London wide.

Research highlighted by the London Assembly Member Murad Qureshi found that over 230 buildings of 20 stories or more are in the pipeline for development, radically altering the shape of the capital’s skyline without meeting London’s housing need. Of the 230, 189 are residential, but primarily luxury flats with relatively small numbers of affordable housing meaning they will make little contribution to solving the housing crisis.

Whilst recognising there is a place for skyscrapers in the capital Murad argues that further luxury penthouses do little to address the needs of ordinary Londoners and threatens the historic London skyline. Murad was joined by Assembly Members from all parties in unanimously supporting a motion calling on the Mayor to adopt new policies to protect London’s skyline. The motion also called for the Mayor to establish a Skyline Commission made up of design experts from a variety of fields to offer advice on commissioning and carry out design reviews.

Murad Qureshi AM, Labour London wide Assembly Member, said:

“The Mayor is making a mockery of his planning policies when he continues to wave through proposals for skyscrapers which do little to help people looking for an affordable place to live. Under Boris Johnson, London is fast becoming a high-rise playground for the super-rich leaving more and more Londoners priced out of the market.

“Tall buildings have their place, but they must respect the existing character of the local area and meet a genuine need. That’s why I am calling on the Mayor to rethink his gung-ho approach to skyscrapers in the capital.”

ENDS

Notes

–       Murad Qureshi AM is a Labour London wide Assembly Member.

–       Research released earlier this year on behalf of New London Architecture found 236 buildings 20 storeys or taller had been proposed, received planning permission, or were being built. The report is available here: http://www.newlondonarchitecture.org/dls/TB_B1.pdf.

–       The Skyline Campaign has been fronted jointly by the Observer and the Architects Journal. More information is available here: http://www.architectsjournal.co.uk/home/skyline/.

–       The motion, introduced by Labour Member Navin Shah and seconded by Labour Member Nicky Gavron, was agreed unanimously at the London Assembly Plenary on 05 November 2014. The full text of the motion is:

“This Assembly notes with concern the revelation earlier this year by New London Architecture that over 230 tall buildings are in the pipeline for development. The cumulative impact of these developments on London’s skyline is not being thoroughly considered, with the resultant often bland design and irreversible negative impact posing a threat to London’s heritage, character and architectural distinctiveness. 80% of these buildings are residential, mostly luxury flats which will do little to alleviate the housing crisis.

Tall buildings can make a positive contribution to city life and the skyline, but only if they’re in the right places, meet the right needs, and respect the character and identity of the surrounding area. However, the flaws of ill-considered tall buildings have been well demonstrated by the skyline campaign.

The London Plan includes policies on tall buildings, but these are not being properly implemented in planning decisions. There are also examples where height limits established by Opportunity Area Planning Frameworks have been ignored.

This Assembly therefore calls on the Mayor to rethink his approach to tall buildings in London. To protect London’s skyline and arrive at well considered appropriate high rise buildings the Mayor should establish a ‘skyline commission’ made up of design experts from a variety of fields to offer advice on commissioning, have an enabling role and carry out design reviews.

The Mayor should also develop more detailed and rigorous masterplanning processes, including engagement of local residents and stakeholders, especially within Opportunity Areas, and implement a clusters policy. There should be a review of existing protected views with the intention of adding new viewing corridors, as well as a recognition that views from all angles – even if not within a protected corridor – should be a planning consideration. The GLA should support the development of a fully interactive 3D computer model of London’s emerging skyline in order to allow development proposals to be visualised within the context of their contribution to the London skyline. Finally, the Mayor should require all developers with proposals for tall buildings to consider other building configurations.”