Author Archives: Murad

Focus on local air quality in Chinese cities but what are the authorities doing?

Beijing this past weekend as it suffers smog

Beijing this past weekend as it suffers smog

Over the weekend many parts of northern China experienced serous air pollution. PM2.5 (particulate matter less than 2.5 micrometer in diameter) data in Beijing reached 470 to 490 on Saturday morning, which according to the Air Quality Index is the most polluted air quality. And heavy fog will continue to envelop a large swathe of East and Central China in several days.

China has made progress in combating environmental pollution, but apparently it still has a lot to do to improve its overall air quality.

The Better Air Quality 2012 conference, organized by Clean Air Asia in Hong Kong recently, was hopeful about the effectiveness of mitigating measures rather than people adapting to poor air quality. Soon after the conference, the Chinese government announced new air pollution reduction plan, which is aimed at cutting gas emissions and pollutants and reflects a change in emphasis.

China will cut the PM2.5 intensity by at least 5 percent by 2015 in 13 major areas covering 117 cities, according to a plan issued by the Ministry of Environment Protection. The levels of other pollutants such as PM10 and SO2 (sulfur dioxide) will be reduced by 10 percent while that of NO2 (nitrogen dioxide) will be cut by 7 percent.

China has also vowed to release hourly air pollution data for 74 of its biggest cities from Jan 1 in response to the increasing environmental concern among its citizens. Of late, an increasing number of Chinese people have been complaining against pollution and murky gray skies in cities.

The monitoring will include not only PM2.5, but also SO2, NO2, ozone and carbon monoxide, and data will be collected from 496 monitoring stations.

Microscopic pollutant particles in the air caused the premature death of an estimated 8,600 people in 2012 and an economic loss of about $1 billion in Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou and Xi’an, according to a study by Peking University which measured pollutant levels of PM2.5.

Urban residents have become more aware of the benefits of air quality data, which has prompted the Chinese authorities to issue hourly data on air pollution.

Many Chinese cities have removed smoke belching chimneys and coal-burning factories in recent years, but the increase in the number of cars has created new air quality problems. In this respect, electric vehicles (EVs) with their zero-tailpipe emission were seen as the panacea, offering much hope. But the slow progress in EVs’ development and affordability seems to have dashed that hope.

Let us look at the somewhat different experiences of London and Hong Kong. The London mayor, in his previous term, had hoped to put 100,000 electric vehicles on the road and to install 25,000 plug-in-points in the city. He even hoped that 1,000 of the Great London Assembly vehicles would be run on electricity. But only 1,500 electric vehicles have hit the roads, 900 plug-in-points have been set up and just 50-odd GLA vehicles are running on electricity.

Most of the 3,000 EVs in the United Kingdom are part of companies’ fleets and this trend is likely to continue in the immediate future. Though the UK’s network of charging points continues to expand – 400 more points are likely to be added in London – the price of new electric cars remains high despite the government’s 5,000 pounds subsidy for each vehicle.

But Hong Kong informed the BAQ2012 that many manufacturers had conducted EV trials, 373 EVs from different makers had been registered and more than 1,000 standard charging points set up, 500 of which were in government car parks. So it appears that with the concerted efforts of the government, power companies, property developers and car park operators, the EV charging infrastructure in Hong Kong is expanding progressively. That’s a positive sign.

On the Chinese mainland, the combined efforts of the government and the private sector are helping drive the global growth in environmental certification. Almost 82,000 Chinese companies have qualified for ISO14001, of which more than 12,200 did so in 2011 alone.

This is the highest growth rate in the world and can attribute to Chinese companies’ realization that the standard can help them reduce their environmental impact, as well as maintain their competitive advantage, cut costs, enhance their reputation and win new business.

In these times of global economic uncertainty, the continued increase in the number of Chinese companies with environmental certification proves that investing in environmental measures will help build a sustainable economic future.

So while critical global environmental issues like climate change have been effectively put on hold because UN member countries have not agreed on a treaty to succeed the Kyoto Protocol, attention has been diverted to more localized global environmental concerns like poor air quality in cities. This development can only improve urban residents’ life in countries like China.

This blog was published as a guest column in the China Daily on the 14th of January 2013.

Brigade under fire as residents are put in “˜jeopardy’ by Westminster fire station closure plans

The warnings come as the London Fire Brigade unveiled plans to close 12 fire stations across the capital to save £45million in the next two years.

Shutting Westminster fire station in Greycoat Place, Pimlico, will put extra strain on remaining Westminster stations in Harrow Road, Paddington, and Shaftesbury Avenue, Soho, say critics.

In addition Belsize fire station, which is called upon as back-up for larger incidents in north Westminster, is also slated for closure under plans that will see 18 fire engines and around 400 firefighter jobs slashed from the brigade. Euston and West Hampstead stations, which also provide support, are not on the closure list, which will go out for public consultation before a final decision is made by the London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority in June. A three-month target has been set for the changes to come into effect.

Paul Embery, London secretary of the Fire Brigade Union (FBU), said: “These proposed cuts are dangerous and wrong. If they are implemented, they will undoubtedly jeopardise the safety of Londoners and firefighters alike.

“The London Fire Brigade now faces perhaps the biggest threat to its ability to function since the Second World War.”

The borough’s firefighters last year attended more than 5,200 false alarms ““ greater than anywhere else in the capital ““ more than 1,000 fires and more than 1,800 other incidents, making it one of the most testing boroughs in London.

Yet the brigade argues its proposals will not endanger lives. It says the average response time for the first engine to arrive at any fire in Westminster will rise by 42 seconds to 5m 50s, still within its six-minute target. Nearly 30 seconds will be added to the average time it takes a second engine to arrive, but it remains within the brigade’s eight minutes target.

But Mr Embury added: “Anyone who knows anything about firefighting knows that it isn’t just about the speed of response; the weight of response ““ ensuring that you have adequate resources to deal with developing and large-scale incidents ““ is just as crucial.

“These cuts would deplete the service and impair its ability to respond quickly and effectively to serious incidents.”

Murad Qureshi, a Labour Londonwide member of the London Assembly, called the cuts “reckless”.

The proposals come in light of a fall in the number of incidents over the last 10 years. In 2011, Westminster station firefighters answered 655 fewer calls than they did in 2001, a fall of 32 per cent. But Paddington station answered 2,124 fewer calls, a drop of 48 per cent, yet it remains off the closure list as the priority is keeping response times within target.

Ron Dobson, London Fire Brigade commissioner, said “significant changes” were needed to meet the money-saving targets. He said: “Having spent 33 years as a firefighter serving the capital I know how important it is to respond to incidents as quickly as possible and I have every intention of maintaining our current response time targets for first and second fire engines.

“With all the work we do to prevent fires happening, and response times that are still amongst the best in the country, I am confident these savings can be made while keeping London safe.”

Click here to view full article

London loses 12 Fire Stations, 18 Fire Engines and 520 Fire-Fighters

Westminster Fire Station earmarked for closure

Westminster Fire Station earmarked for closure

Today, we learned that Boris Johnson will close 12 fire stations across London. The list of closures was revealed by the London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority (LFEPA). The stations are spread across London and include Westminster fire station in SW1 as well as Knightsbridge fire station in SW3.  The London Fire Brigade’s budget will be cut by the Mayor and government by £45 million over the next two years. Even after the 12 stations, 18 fire appliances and 520 fire-fighters have been cut, the Mayor and LFEPA will still have to find over £5 million of cuts.  On average it costs £1.4 million to run a one fire engine station.

The fire stations listed for closure are:

  • Belsize in Camden
  • Bow in Tower Hamlets
  • Clapham in Lambeth
  • Clerkenwell in Islington
  • Downham in Lewisham
  • Kingsland in Hackney
  • Knightsbridge in Kensington & Chelsea
  • New Cross in Lewisham
  • Silvertown in Newham
  • Southwark
  • Westminster
  • Woolwich in Greenwich

In addition the following stations will lose one of their two fire engines: Chelsea, Chingford, Hayes, Leyton, Leytonstone, Peckham and Whitechapel.

London’s fire brigade is facing a crisis, today we found out we will lose Westminster and Knightsbridge fire stations, as well as the closure of a further 10 fire stations across the whole of London, 18 fire engines and 520 fire-fighters. This will undoubdedly reduce fire cover in London, putting the safety and security of Londoners at risk.   The London Fire Brigade and their dedicated staff do a fantastic job keeping us safe and helping us when we need it most. These cuts are hitting front-line services and putting public safety at risk.

Mayor’s plan confirms fewer local police in Westminster

The new analysis shows that compared to 2010 many boroughs will lose significant numbers of police officers, including:

<city w:st=”on”><place w:st=”on”>Westminster</place></city> losing 202 police officers

Kensington & Chelsea losing 50 police officers

Hammersmith & Fulham losing 32 police officers

<city w:st=”on”><place w:st=”on”>Camden</place></city> losing 111 police officers

The Mayor’s Draft Policing Plan also details how the current locally based Safer Neighbourhood Teams will have less dedicated resources. Each SNT currently has three PCSOs, two PCs and one sergeant. The new model will see each SNT having only one dedicated PC and a “named sergeant”. This is a move back to Sector-based policing, a model that was abandoned in the late 1990s as it was deemed to be ineffective and led to the police having poor relations on a local level.

Londonwide Assembly Member Murad Qureshi AM said:

"This plan confirms our worst fears. We already know that <city w:st=”on”>London</city> has lost over 2,000 police officers in the last two years, but this plan confirms that the majority of <city w:st=”on”><place w:st=”on”>London</place></city>’s boroughs will have fewer police officers than in 2010. Combined with the closure of 65 police front counters and the loss of nearly half of <city w:st=”on”><place w:st=”on”>London</place></city>’s PCSOs, this will lead to a smaller police presence on our streets. The government and mayor are cutting too far and too fast, they are hitting the frontline. 

"In <city w:st=”on”><place w:st=”on”>Westminster</place></city> we will lose 202 police officers with 50 fewer in Kensington & Chelsea than in 2010, and that’s if the Mayor can actually deliver on his proposals which I don’t think he can. 

<street w:st=”on”>Harrow Road</street>, <city w:st=”on”>St John’s</city>

Wood and Marylebone Station police stations in our borough, this will make it harder for local people to report serious crimes and reduce the police’s presence."

“To make matters worse this proposed plan details how the Mayor will strip out our local Safer Neighbourhood Teams which are vital in fighting crime in <city w:st=”on”><place w:st=”on”>London</place></city>. SNTs build local knowledge and get to know their patch, the proposals today look very much like a return to the old model of sector policing which does not have this strong local link. The Mayor’s plans will also see a loss of many experienced senior officers, which raises obvious concerns about the supervision of police constables.

“We doubt the mayor can keep his election promises, as HMIC reported last week police visibility is down and this trend will continue. Contrary to what they say, this is further evidence that the Mayor and Government are cutting too far too fast."

Notes

1.      Murad Qureshi is a Labour Londonwide Assembly Member.

2.      Attached is the analysis of Police Officer and PCSO strength for <city w:st=”on”><place w:st=”on”>London</place></city>’s 32 boroughs for 2010 compared to toady’s announcement:

<shapetype coordsize=”21600,21600″ o:spt=”75″ o:preferrelative=”t” path=”m@4@5l@4@11@9@11@9@5xe” filled=”f” stroked=”f” id=”_x0000_t75″><stroke joinstyle=”miter”></stroke><formulas><f eqn=”if lineDrawn pixelLineWidth 0″></f><f eqn=”sum @0 1 0″></f><f eqn=”sum 0 0 @1″></f><f eqn=”prod @2 1 2″></f><f eqn=”prod @3 21600 pixelWidth”></f><f eqn=”prod @3 21600 pixelHeight”></f><f eqn=”sum @0 0 1″></f><f eqn=”prod @6 1 2″></f><f eqn=”prod @7 21600 pixelWidth”></f><f eqn=”sum @8 21600 0″></f><f eqn=”prod @7 21600 pixelHeight”></f><f eqn=”sum @10 21600 0″></f></formulas><path o:extrusionok=”f” gradientshapeok=”t” o:connecttype=”rect”></path><lock v:ext=”edit” aspectratio=”t”></lock></shapetype><shape type=”#_x0000_t75″ o:ole=”” style=”WIDTH: 1in; HEIGHT: 56.25pt” id=”_x0000_i1025″><imagedata src=”file:///C:DOCUME~1NsalihLOCALS~1Tempmsohtml11clip_image001.wmz” o:title=””></imagedata></shape>

3.      Also attached is the Mayor’s Draft Police and Crime Plan:

<shape type=”#_x0000_t75″ o:ole=”” style=”WIDTH: 1in; HEIGHT: 56.25pt” id=”_x0000_i1026″><imagedata src=”file:///C:DOCUME~1NsalihLOCALS~1Tempmsohtml11clip_image003.wmz” o:title=””></imagedata></shape>

4.      The HMIC Report which can be found here http://www.hmic.gov.uk/data/valuing-the-police-data/ (first link under "2012", "Average percentage of police officers and PCSOs visible and available to the public 2010 and 2012").

5.   Draft MOPAC/MPS Estate Strategy 2013/2016 can be viewed here:  http://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/Draft%20MOPAC%20MPS%20Estate%20Strategy%202013-2016.pdf  (see page 38 for list of station/front counter closures.

“Mayor’s budget an insult to Londoners”

The Mayor’s GLA Budget includes the Metropolitan Police, London Fire Brigade and Transport for <city w:st=”on”><place w:st=”on”>London</place></city>. The figures revealed last week will take effect from April. <city w:st=”on”>London</city>’s emergency services are facing steep cuts and frontline services in <city w:st=”on”><place w:st=”on”>Westminster</place></city> will be hit hard:

·         The London Fire Brigade is likely facing the loss of over 20 stations including potentially Westminster fire station, 30 fire engines and hundreds of fire-fighters in light of £40million of further cuts it must make this year and next year

·         The Metropolitan Police have lost 2,208 police officers across <city w:st=”on”>London</city> and 247 police officers in <city w:st=”on”><place w:st=”on”>Westminster</place></city> since May 2010. With a proposed £75.8million reduction in the Police Officer wage bill next year, this number could reduce even further.

The Mayor has raised transport fares in <city w:st=”on”><place w:st=”on”>London</place></city> above inflation for the fifth year running. As Chair of Transport for <city w:st=”on”><place w:st=”on”>London</place></city>, Boris Johnson is responsible for setting fare levels for the capital.

Londonwide Assembly Member Murad Qureshi said:”Wages for the majority of workers are barely rising and Londoners are really struggling more then elsewhere in the <place w:st=”on”><country-region w:st=”on”>UK</country-region></place>. It is scandalous that Boris has not used his power to curb fare rises, and an insult to hard-working Londoners that he’s claiming credit for saving households 7 pence a week.

“If he’s not there to stand up for Londoners in tough times, then what exactly is he there for? In the past two years TfL have collected £251million more than they were expecting in fares. Last year Londoners paid an average of £782 a year on public transport. It is ludicrous for the Mayor to claim he can’t help Londoners.

“<city w:st=”on”>London</city>’s emergency services still face steep cuts and we’ve seen 247 police officers in <city w:st=”on”>Westminster</city> lost since May 2010, as well as the potential closure of <city w:st=”on”><place w:st=”on”>Westminster</place></city> fire station. With deeper spending cuts on the way from central government, it is time Boris put <city w:st=”on”><place w:st=”on”>London</place></city> before his own ambitions.”

Ends

Notes

1.      Murad Qureshi is a Londonwide Assembly Member.

2.   In May 2010 there were 33,147 Police Officers in <place w:st=”on”><city w:st=”on”>London</city></place>, in the last month for which figures are available (November 2012) there were 30,939.

3.   Boris Johnson speaking on the London Mayoral debate programme aired on BBC television on 22 April 2012 said that fares would “go down in an honest and sustainable way”.

4. TfL fare surpluses can be found on page 13 of the December 2012 London Assembly Budget Committee’s pre Budget report: www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/PBR%202012%20-%20FINAL.pdf

Time Met woke up to the real English Defence League

 

EDL marches will continue to blight local communities

EDL marches will continue to blight local communities

In light of past experiences of English Defence League marches and the recent ban, I, together with my BME colleagues in the Labour Group at the London Assembly wrote to the Met Police Commissioner, Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe urging him to revise the Met’s view about the status of the EDL.  Back in September 2009, Sir Paul Stephenson told the MPA that the EDL “are not viewed as an extreme right wing group in the accepted sense”.  Last year, it was reported that Adrian Tudway, head of the national domestic extremism unit at Scotland Yard, stated in an email to a Muslim organisation that “in terms of the position with EDL, the original stance stands, they are not extreme right wing as a group” adding “I really think you need to open a direct line of dialogue with them, that might be the best way to engage them and re-direct their activity”.  These sentiments are not only patronising to London’s Muslim community, they are wholly inconsistent with the EDL’s recent actions and the reaction by the local community to their presence.  In our letter to the Commissioner, we asked him to consider the following……
 
“The recent arrests by the Met Police and the request to ban the march…. were both based upon intelligence led investigation; it is clear, therefore, that the perception of the EDL as a non right wing organisation is misconceived.  This misconception should be put right, and we hope that recent actions by the Met police and the Home Secretary should pave a way forward to restating the Met’s views on the EDL.    We believe this is the time to draw a line in the sand from past statements made by or on behalf of the Met on this subject and we seek your reassurance that such statements will not be made under your watch in the future”

The response by the Commissioner is understandable, but nontheless disappointing.  As a non-proscribed group, then the EDL appear to escape the full glare of the Met, but isn’t it time we stopped worrying so much about their classication and more about the affect this group  has on local community cohesion?

TfL celebrates 150th anniversary of tube but neglects oldest parts

Levers in the Edgware Road signal box dating back to 1925

Levers in the Edgware Road signal box dating back to 1925

 It is right and proper that we celebrate the public transport heritage of London this year for the 150th anniversary of the opening of the metropolitan line between Paddington and Farringdon on the 24th of May 1862. But why has the oldest part of the tube been neglected during the line upgrades being undertaken by London Underground both within the PPP and now that is has been brought in house?

Take for example, the state of disrepair on Platform 5 in Baker Street tube station were coincidentally we have billboards attesting to the history of the line and as a result drawing many tourists. Water penetration can be regularly seen cascading down from the Marylebone Road above the platforms and is clearly causing damage internally to the station.  This will have not escaped the notice of the many passengers of the tube of that alight and make their changes in the network at this point. Indeed l have seen Japanese & Korean tourist being very amused by the state of it all! I think the joke is that it would never be allowed to get to this state in their respective capital cities of Tokyo and Seoul subway systems. Indeed it does raise health and safety concerns which l have always assume TfL senior management are comfortable is being managed. 

Then we have of course the signal box at Edgware Road. This section of the underground is home to a signal box dating back to 1920’s and still uses levers to get trains through the station! The rightful place for this piece of equipment is in a museum and not as a mechanism on a very busy part of one the busiest networks in the world. The equipment is several decades older then some of the younger lines like the Victoria lines yet their signals get replaced before these ancient relics of a bye-gone age.

More recently Edgware Rd tube station has drawn the attention of an editorial in the Guardian newspaper because of the poor performance of the Circle line there. It suggests it should not be called the Circle line anymore as it appears not to go west bound or anti-clockwise from those platforms. I have suggested its down to the old signal box and till it gets replaced the line should be renamed the lasso line, as it now makes the dash to Hammersmith as well. 

My concern is simply that the oldest part of the tube has been neglected during the line upgrades while works on the much newer lines like the Victoria line opened in 1970 and of course the Jubilee line extension have had alot more attention by London Underground. Surely inventory checks of all the stations would have picked up the conditions of the tracks, signals and platforms on this historic part of the tube system.

Rumour has it that its deliberately kept this way, to draw funding by TfL from Department of Transport for other parts of the tube system. Whether that’s true or not it is time now that the oldest part of the tube gets the signal box changed and platform improvements it deserves to operate in the twenty first century for its many users in central London and further a field. 

So in short, l do not think the metropolitan line’s as it approaches its 150 year of existence is getting the respect it deserves as has lagged behind Victoria, Jubilee & Northern lines for upgrade works. Getting signal upgrades and platforms works completed at critical points would be the best birthday present TfL can give the Met line, ahead of any transport heritage celebrations.

Also published in this week’s Forum in the West End Extra.  

Boris Johnson’s back to work hangover

2013 Fare increase

 Mayor Boris Johnson’s latest round of inflation-busting fare rises come into effect last monday but most people will have returned to work after the break today. This will be the fifth consecutive year that Boris has raised fares above inflation, with this year the average increase being 5.2%.  The Mayor should limit his fare rise to RPI or less. This would help Londoners at a time when their living standards are being squeezed.

Since 2008 bus fares have increased by 56% from 90p to £1.40, a weekly zone 1-6 off-peak travelcard has gone up by 21% to £8.50 and a monthly Zone 1-3 has gone up by 25% to £136.70.

Today local residents in South-West & West Central London are being hit with an above inflation fare rise, at a time when they are facing a real squeeze. It’s time Boris understood the pressure on Londoner’s pockets and reduced the fare rise to inflation or less. Before the election he said he would ‘bear down on fares’ but we have seen no evidence of this since.

To add insult to injury Boris has also announced that there will be above inflation fare rises for another 10 years. He simply doesn’t understand the pressure that ordinary Londoners are under. At a time when rent, food and energy bills are all rising well above inflation the Mayor needs to use his powers to reduce the pressure on Londoners.

With extra pressures on household budgets where does Boris expect people to keep finding extra money for his fare rises? Rather than campaigning for more tax cuts for the very richest, Boris should be spending more time on helping working Londoners who are struggling just to get by.

TRAIN-FARE-RISE-large570

 The Mayor’s commitment to raise fares above inflation can be found on page 48 of the business plan.

 

Bring back the Circle line @Edgware Rd tube

If we have not got a Circle line lets at least call it the Lasso line!

Yesterday l was pleasantly surprised to see one of the national papers, the Guardian editorial taking an interest in a very local interest for many using the tube in central London, where’s the Circle line gone?  

I welcomed the change made in December 2009 to extended the service to Hammersmith, making it more reliable with fewer delays as well. Little did l realise it would put a stop to the service going anti-clockwise (Westbound) from Edgware Rd tube station as the Guardian editorial suggests and appears to be the case from my own useage of the station. So rather then a Circle line we have a Lasso line, as it extends itself to Hammersmith.

Now it should not be to hard to have Circle lines trains going westbound from Edgware Rd, as its central to any improvements. The thing which would really transform the service is removing the dated signal box at Edgware Rd tube stations which dates back to the 1920’s and still controls amazingly one of the busiest junctions on the tube map.  Improve this and you could have more trains going through the junction in both directions.

On the same matter, Simon Jenkins takes a different angle in his column of the 18th of December in the Evening Standard. He is right to look forward to celebrating the Metropolitan line’s 150th birthday in 2013 but l am not sure its being getting the respect it deserves as the Metropolitan ( between Paddington & Farringdon line )line falls well behind other younger lines like the Victoria, Jubilee & Northern lines in its upgrade works. As a result the signal box in Edgware Road dates back to the 1920’s and in Baker Street rain regularly gets down to platform 5 from the Marylebone Rd above. You would have thought these oldest line would be first, in the queue to get upgraded. Instead much newer lines like the Victoria line opened in 1970 and the Jubilee extension has had alot more attention by London Underground both within the PPP and outside it. If these signal upgrades and platform works were done before the celebrations of London’s public transport heritage, that would be more fitting way to celebrate their 150th birthday.

So lets see the Circle line brought back with improvements at Edgware Rd tube and in particular the updating of the signal box at the tube station. In the meantime, it should be known as the lasso line.

Flooding risk creeps round & into London

 

 

Areial photo of Thames Ditton Island which maybe under threat from flooding

Areial photo of Thames Ditton Island which maybe under threat from flooding

It was time the floods that have been affecting  the rest of the country were about to affect us in London as well, as reported by local news in London yesterday.

At present the Thames catchment is completely saturated due to the continued rainfall which is  producing very high river flows. When l got in touch with the Environment Agency, l was assured that it continues to ensure the rivers remain monitored for their  levels and where necessary the Agency will be able to provide appropriate flood warnings to the public to safeguard themselves and their property.

What made this weekend even more unusual is that we also see a period of spring tides peaking at the weekend. That is the tidal pull of a full moon.  So we have a double whammy with the high rainfall  flows coming down the river combined with the spring  tides coming up the river producing levels upstream in Teddington which puts property on islands such as Trowlock and Thames Ditton at risk. To safeguard these properties the Thames Barrier closed on two occasions on Thursday 27th December and in the early hours of today Friday 28th to prevent the tide from flowing into London and further increasing river levels.

Although the river flows are gradually reducing , the weather systems coming in over the weekend may see higher tide levels. The Environment Agency will continue to monitor the situation and if conditions require they will again close the Barrier. If you live in Thames Ditton or Trowlock islands, and want to be informed of the river levels please find the links within the names of the islands above.  

So whilst there is no risk to areas in central London from tidal flooding, islands in the Thames like Thames Ditton on the boundary of  Greater London and Trowlock in the Royal Borough of Richmond are certainly under threat this last weekend of 2012. But for the legacy of the old GLC in the form of  the Thames Barrier, we would not be in a position to protect them from flooding from down stream on the Thames.