Author Archives: Murad

Is Obama going to be the first Asian American US President?

 

Is Barack Obama the first Asian president of the United States? (JG Graphic) 

 
It is sometimes said that Bill Clinton was the first black president of the United States, such was his popularity among the black electorate. So by the same token, is Obama, in his second term, going to become the first Asian president of the US? With the overwhelming endorsement of Asian-American citizens, his first trip to Asia already undertaken this term and his foreign policy tilt toward the East, this may not be as strange as it sounds.

Somewhat overlooked when analyzing the results of the 2012 US presidential elections, was the extent to which Asian-Americans backed Obama. The figure was up to 73 percent; surpassing the Latino and female vote. Romney’s China-bashing was ill-received, and seat uncomfortably with Asian-Americans. Attacking China as an economic cheat served only to raise fears among Asian-Americans, thereby alienating this group of voters.

Asian-Americans make up 3.4 percent of the national electorate, and it is estimated by some that by 2050, this figure will rise to 10 percent. In states like California, it could be at least 20 percent from the present 11 percent. So the Asian-American vote is growing and its potential should not be underestimated.

Obama’s appeal to the average Asian-American is mirrored by a wider global appeal, illustrated well by Pew Research and the fact that much of the world cheered the November re-election of Obama. This support was not necessarily be seen as an endorsement of US foreign policy. In particular there is still widespread opposition to US drone strikes as part of his anti-terrorism policy; his failure to meet expectations that he would tackle climate change; and crucially his failure to position the US as a more even-handed broker between Israel and Palestine. Yet, his popularity in Asia, especially Southeast Asia, is undented.

His relationship with South Asian countries is, however, more complex. In 2009, in Muslim-majority countries like Afghanistan and Pakistan, people hoped he would be different from the administration of George W. Bush. But after Obama’s winning of a second term in the White House, his popularity in these countries has never been lower. In Indonesia he enjoys massive popularity; this is not surprising considering that Obama has placed a lot of importance on relations with this Muslim-majority country. As for relations with China, this is likely to evolve into a working but competitive one, particularly in the context of wider Asia geopolitics, as illustrated by his trip to Myanmar.

So what should we make of his recent trip to Myanmar? It was part of a three-leg tour which also took in Thailand and Cambodia for an Association of Southeast Asian Nations conference in mid-November. This made him the first US president to visit Myanmar and meet President Thein Sein and Aung San Suu Kyi, leader of the pro-democracy movement.

The White House itself has spoken of a “pivot” toward Asia, as the Americans’ strategic focus becomes the fast-growing Asian countries, away from war and terrorism in the Middle East and Afghanistan. Clearly this trip to Myanmar reflects a watershed in policy and focus following the importance the US has placed on normalizing relations with Myanmar. For the US, this represents an opportunity to have a greater stake in the region, partly to counter the influence of China.

Interestingly, in his book “Monsoon: The Indian Ocean and the Future of American Power” academic and journalist Robert Kaplan observes the following:

“In short, Burma [Myanmar] provides a code for understanding the world to come. It is a prize to be fought over, as China and India are doing so right now. Recognizing the importance of what Burma and its neighbors represent at a time of new energy pathways, unstable fuel prices, and seaboard natural disasters. … For the US, Indian Ocean states like Burma are now, or should be, central to their calculations.”

Importantly, he wrote this well before Obama’s re-election, so clearly someone is listening in the State Department.

Further, Kaplan, based on his knowledge of the State Department, argues that the appointment of special envoys for Israel-Palestine; Afghanistan-Pakistan, and North Korea, will free up the US secretary of state to concentrate on the Indian Ocean and Asia-Pacific regions. Structurally at least, the State Department is now better organized then it has been for some time to respond to a rising India and China. Indeed John Kerry, the newly appointed secretary of state, should consider himself fortunate to be taking over at such a time of freed-up resources within the State Department.

So, Asians both in the US and abroad are set to have even more dealings with Obama in his second term. He is naturally more in tune with the region — having lived in Indonesia in his formative years and by having an Asian half-sister. This backdrop inevitably acts to make him culturally more approachable and appealing to the Asian electorate. The future of American power lies in the East; this notion is strengthened by the re-election of President Obama, who has already made a clear play for Asia. Based on recent policy and the apparent lean toward Asia, it looks as though Obama himself would have little trouble being perceived as the first Asian US president.

This blog was published as an article in the Jakarta Globe on the 31st of  January 2013.

Londoners shouldn’t have been left out in the cold by Davey & Boris

Fuel Poverty is growing, yet with energy prices skyrocketing by up to 11 per cent this winter it is unlikely many people are unaware of this growing crisis.

Fuel-poverty-woman-wrapped-up-and-shivering-indoors

National Energy Action estimates that as a direct result of the recent round of price hikes, an additional 266,000 households were made fuel poor. That is equivalent to a town a little bigger than Stoke-on-Trent.

In London the picture is stark. Before the price hikes, well over half a million London households were fuel poor. Yet London has got a raw deal from the energy companies – and not just on pricing.

Since April 2008, energy companies have been required to deliver home insulation measures to households as part of the Carbon Emissions Reduction Target, a programme that was renewed by the coalition following the election.

However, figures from the Energy Savings Trust show that while 14.7% of homes nationally have received measures, the number for London is only 7.2%.

London has been hindered because it is in general more expensive to insulate homes in London due to the higher occurrence of solid wall properties and flats. Despite their huge profits, this has given energy companies little incentive to retrofit homes in London when they can do it much cheaper in other regions.

The energy companies’ shortfall has been matched by a failure of the mayor to deliver his own target to retrofit 200,000 homes in London by 2012. In the end, the Mayor delivered in 88,000 homes.

What is worse, from this April the Mayor will no longer be directly funding home retrofit measures and will instead rely on those very same energy companies to retrofit London homes once the new Energy Company Obligation and Green Deal are fully introduced.

This is a dangerous strategy and one that could leave Londoners cold.

CERT essentially failed due to the lack of regional targets compelling energy companies to deliver their obligations in London – allowing a flight of measures out of London and into the regions where retrofitting was cheaper. But despite the stronger focus on solid wall insulation within ECO, these regional targets are still absent. Furthermore, the lack of interest so far in the Green Deal should be a worry for the Mayor.

But the situation is worse than that.

As a result of the gap between the end of the existing retrofitting schemes and the new schemes becoming fully functional, the Insulation Industry Forum predicted 625 jobs will be lost in London during 2013.

The energy secretary, Ed Davey, has failed to commit to introducing regional targets. Given the evidence, this should be a minimum assurance he – particularly as a London MP – should be instituting within the scheme. Without this the government is letting down hard pressed households who could desperately use a little help to reduce their energy bills.

This blog was published on Left Foot Forward on the 1st of Feb, Fuel Poverty awareness day.

Londoners shouldn’t be left out in the cold

Since April 2008 energy companies have been required to deliver home insulation measures to households as part of the Carbon Emissions Reduction Target. However, Energy Savings Trust figures show that while 14.7% of homes nationally have received measures, the number for <city w:st=”on”><place w:st=”on”>London</place></city> is only 7.2%.  The figures for the following boroughs are:

  • <city w:st=”on”><place w:st=”on”>Westminster</place></city> ““ 2.1%

  • Kensington & Chelsea ““ 0.9%

  • <city w:st=”on”><place w:st=”on”>Kingston-Upon-Thames</place></city> ““ 7.7%

  • <city w:st=”on”><place w:st=”on”>Richmond-Upon-Thames</place></city> ““ 4.6%

  • Hounslow ““ 5.9%

The figures are bad news for the Boris Johnson, who has himself failed to meet his own target to retrofit 200,000 homes by 2012, delivering only 67,000. From April the Mayor will no longer be directly funding home retrofit measures and will instead rely on energy companies to deliver such measures.

As a result of the gap between the end of the existing retrofitting schemes and the new schemes becoming fully functional, the Insulation Industry Forum predicted that 625 jobs will be lost in <city w:st=”on”><place w:st=”on”>London</place></city> during 2013.

Labour Londonwide Assembly Member Murad Qureshi said:

“With energy prices rising by up to 11 per cent this winter, fuel poverty is becoming an even bigger problem in <city w:st=”on”><place w:st=”on”>London</place></city>. But, with only half the number of homes receiving insulation measures in <city w:st=”on”>London</city> compared to elsewhere in the <country-region w:st=”on”><place w:st=”on”>UK</place></country-region>, it is not just on pricing that Londoners are getting a raw deal from energy companies.

“Given that mayoral investment in home insulation will end soon and that the energy companies have completely failed to help Londoners save money and keep warm, I worry that we will continue to see more Londoners having to choose between heating, eating and paying the rent.

“On Fuel Poverty Awareness Day I encourage all Londoners who are struggling to heat their homes to ensure they are getting all the help available. It should not be a choice between food and fuel. It is essential that energy companies do all they can to help Londoners reduce their fuel consumption and live in more energy efficient homes. Energy companies are not doing enough to deliver on their responsibilities and Londoners are being left out in the cold.”

Ends

Notes

1.      Murad Qureshi is a Londonwide Assembly Member and Labour Group spokesperson on environment and health issues.

2.      Energy Saving Trust CERT Summary Report can be found here http://www.energysavingtrust.org.uk/Publications2/Housing-professionals/HEED-PDFs/HEED-publications-for-UK/CERT-reports-Q16/CERT-Summary-Report-Q16-by-Local-Authority

3.      The London Assembly Health and Public Services Committee’s Fuel Poverty report can be found here http://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/Fuel%20poverty%20-%20Final%20report.pdf

999 services “devastated” in Westminster

The Mayor is accused of holding “˜sham consultations’ across London for his draft Police and Crime Plan. The Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime Stephen Greenhalgh will be attending the consultation in Westminster tonight but as yet the Mayor has not attended any of the consultation sessions.

Across London, 999 services are being threatened:

<dir><dir>

The London Fire Brigade’s budget has been cut by the Mayor and government by £45 million for the next two years. Boris Johnson wants to close 12 fire stations, lose 18 fire appliances and axe 520 firefighter posts

London Ambulance Service is currently being cut by £53 million (19%) of it’s budget by 2015/16, resulting in 890 job cuts, of which 560 will be frontline jobs

The Metropolitan Police have already lost 2,147 police officers and 1,682 PCSOs since May 2010. The Mayor has earmarked 65 police stations and front-counters for closure. The Met’s own Chief Financial Operating Officer has labelled the Met’s Budget for the coming year as ‘very risky’

NHS London delivered efficiency savings of around £1 billion in 2011/12 and is committed to further savings of £600 million in 2012/13 and £500 million in 2013/14. Eight

A&Es are due to be closed across London

Murad Qureshi is a Labour Londonwide Assembly Member

The Metropolitan Police’s Chief Financial Operating Officer spoke at the London Assembly Budget and Performance Committee, 9th January 2013.

</dir></dir>

"I’m concerned that cuts to frontline services in Westminster will place immense pressure on an already stretched ambulance service. The government and the Mayor are cutting too far, too fast and these cuts will inevitably endanger families and communities across the capital.

"The Mayor can’t give a straight answer about the affect on the London Ambulance Service of his proposed cuts, particularly with the proposed closure of eight A&Es across London. Under current plans, with London’s population both growing and ageing, the London Ambulance Service which operates across London is set to bear the brunt."

Ends

Notes

<dir><dir></dir></dir>

SOS for Lewisham A&E

 

The front of the demo last saturday at Lewisham

The front of the demo last saturday at Lewisham

Last Saturday, in a show of solidarity, l joined the huge demo in Lewisham over the proposed closure of the A&E at Lewisham Hospital. The banner which caught my eye the most during the demo was one saying “We can bail out the banks but not the hospitals”.  It makes the point well.  Indeed, the banks were bailed out for hundreds of billions of pounds whilst hospitals are asking for a relatively small proportion of that sum – tens of millions to help them survive. 

In the case of Lewisham Hospital, the problem stems from the Private Finance Initiative (PFI) which the South London Health Trust (SLHT) entered into to redevelop two other hospitals. The government plans are to save the PFI by sacrificing Lewisham Hospital. 

The point about PFIs started me thinking. In London, we had similar private finance procurement brought back into the public domain. Yes, it was a Tory Mayor; Boris Johnson who brought the PPP on the tube up-grade back in-house after the government imposed the contract on TfL. So why can’t the same be done with PFIs? After all, it’s not as though the British banking fraternity doesn’t owe us a few favours!  What we need is for the Trusts to opt out of these PFIs with are saddled with huge annual fees and which cut into the operating costs of the hospitals.  If Government policy centred more on saving hospitals, rather then closing them down, as it did with the banks, these proposals would look a lot less like an ideological drive towards reducing public services. 

We will hear this afternoon the fate of Lewisham A&E from the State of Secretary for Health, Jeremy Hunt.  It is clearly a much loved and well run emergency service.  The recommendation to close this special service from the Trust Special Administrator (TSA) should be thrown out as Lewisham which is not even part of the South London Healthcare NHS Trust, is being targeted in a re-organisation of services across the area following the trust’s financial problems. If the Secretary of State does follow the TSA recommendation it will rightly face a legal challenge by Lewisham Council. 

For further information on the PFI arrangement, analysis of it within the South London Health Trust (SLHT) and the impact on Lewisham hospital, please visit www.PeopleBeforeProfit.org.uk.

Poor air quality causes deaths in London as well

Dear Editor,

I read with much interest your editorial ‘Smoke Alarms’ on air pollution in China of the 19th of January.

You are right to say air pollution has a human and economic cost in Chinese cities, but let’s not forget it is still an issue in London today. Every year nearly 4,300 premature deaths result from the poor air quality London. That is almost 20 times the number of road fatalities. In fact, in the central London boroughs of Westminster, Camden and Kensington & Chelsea the problem is so bad that 8.3 per cent of all deaths can be attributed to air pollution. It is a silent killer.

London’s problem is not getting better either. Nitrogen dioxide levels in several areas across the capital are already many times above Government annual limits for 2013. So while the problem in London is not as acute as in Chinese cities, it is a serious policy concern that the Mayor has utterly failed to get a grip of.

Murad Qureshi AM

The letter was published in the FT Weekend of the 26th of January 2013.

Municipal capitalism comes down to London

Manchester Airport Group comes down to London

 

Following last weekend’s announcement that Manchester Airport Group (MAG) were successful in bid for Stansted airport, it appears that Greater Manchester local authorities will now have more say on the operational side of aviation in London & the South-East then any London authority, let alone the Mayor of London.  

The Stansted sale is part of the drive by Britain’s competition regulator, The Competition Commission to loosen the grip of Heathrow Airport Holdings – formerly BAA – on the UK airport market and in particular in London & the South-East.  When the Competition Commission broke-up the monopoly that BAA had over the London market, it precipitated BAA’s biggest marketing drive in a an effort to convince us how desperately we needed an expanded Heathrow for the sake of our economy.   This was not surprising in some ways, as BAA had in effect a private monopoly of airports in London & the South East with its holding, not only of Heathrow, but also Stansted & Gatwick.  If anything, this break up should have happened earlier, when BAA was first privatised.  For the London consumers of air travel, whether for business or leisure, this should result in more choice as we see all three airports now competing.     

So where are MAG getting the £1.5 billion to fund the acquisition? Well to reassure residents of the North West, it’s not their councils who sit on the board of MAG who are putting up the cash.  Its largest stake holder is Manchester City Council with 55 per cent; the other local councils in Greater Manchester – Bolton, Rochdale, Stockport, Wigan, Salford, Tameside, Oldham, Trafford & Bury – have a 5 per cent stake each.

As part of the transaction, Australian infrastructure investment group Industry Funds Management (IFM) will become an investor in MAG, invest new equity and take a 35.5 percent stake in the enlarged group. So whilst it is at present publically owned by local authorities from the North-West, its being partly privatised to fund the new acquisition, though the majority control will remain amongst the local authorities.

Interestingly, although we are growing accustomed to the annual adverse impact of snow on UK aviation, when the first recent bout occurred in December 2010, Manchester airport was seen as a beacon of good practise in the way it handled heavy snow “up North” much better then the “southern softie” Heathrow airport. In fact it was used to illustrate an instance where public ownership had out performed its private counterpart.

But lets not get to starry eyed about it all, as the leader of Manchester City Council, Sir Richard Leese has said ” MAG is a key driver  of jobs and growth in the north of England and the acquisition of Stansted will help us deliver maximum value for Manchester City Council and the other local authority shareholders”

So while London local authorities and the Mayor are kept out of the action, a majority publically owned airport operator like MAG, (albeit partly privatised to fund the purchase of Stansted) is leading the way when it comes to the implementation of competition policy. It has a ring of municipal capitalism from “up North” about it, which has made its way down South, nonetheless,  I certainly welcome it.

 

 

Loss of public buildings forgotten legacy of “austerity ”

 

The picture across London looks bleak

The picture across London looks bleak

If you factor in the number of public buildings which will be lost as a result of the cuts to our emergency services across the whole of Greater London, it swiftly becomes apparent that it is not only the demise of emergency services which will beset London (with more then 12 fire stations under threat of closure; 65 Police station front counters being down graded; and the loss of  8 A&E’s across London).  We are also set to lose a plethora of iconic buildings which have served to define an area for many years.

For example, in my own home borough of the City of Westminster, the affect of the cuts set against a backdrop of austerity feel even more acute once you consider plans by the local council and other public authorities to close down various building. Landmarks such as the old Marylebone Town Hall and Marylebone library have already been sold off to London Business School(LBS).  We are also set to lose the “one stop” shops at Church Street and Harrow Road; City hall; St James library and the Jubilee Sports Centre.  Westminster Adult Education Services are selling off their Amberley and EburyBridge site as well.  These losses are incidental to the emergency service closures illustrated in the diagram above which earmarks Westminster fire station, Greycoat Place,SW1 and 3 police stations including Harrow Road, Marylebone & St Johns Wood for closure.  The loss to the local community is much greater then first meets the eye.

Also, and though not shown on the map above, there are also plans to move services from The Western Eye Hospital to St Mary’s.  Like the other buildings mentioned, it is a historic landmark which means something to the local area and to see it lose its identity would be a great shame.  (In this instance, this may be a price worth paying if the move improves clinical outcomes for patients, but we’ll have to wait and see).  Let’s not forget also the “walk in” NHS clinic in Victoria.

Therefore, the forgotten victim of the Government’s austerity programme is the loss of a large number of public buildings in the urban landscape of London.  A proud legacy of the Victorian & Edwardian era which many look to for inspiration is being sold off.  Buildings which are familiar and reassuring to Londoners, defining a neighbourhood and a city are being lost forever to coffee shop and supermarket chains in where we’re being asked to spend even more our lives.  We have suffered the blight of recessions in the past, yet the solution did not include the wholesale selling off of the family silver.   For me, this smacks more of ideology, not austerity, as the loss of valuable iconic public buildings reflect upon attempts to roll back the influence of the state in our lives.  

 

Boris devastates City of Westminster Police Service

 

At Marylebone Police station with Jack Gordon

At Marylebone Police station with Jack Gordon, wondering about impact of its lose for locals

The West End has always dragged attention and resources away from the more residential north of the borough.  Issues relating to the policing of the West End entertainment industry, diplomatic and public order policing are frequently put before the concerns of residents who live in the borough particularly those of us in the North. With the proposed closure of Police station front counters at Harrow Rd, St Johns Wood and Marylebone and reduced hours at Paddington Green, this trend will be even more acute if the Mayor’s proposals are implemented.

The situation is compounded even further with the lost of 247 police officers  between May 2010 and November 2012 and 267 PSCO/Police Support Community Officers and the effective end of safer neighbourhood policing model in the City and the rest of London.

The Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC) are holding consultations on the proposals.  The one for the City of Westminster will take place on the 31st of January, so get yourself there and make your views known.  You can book by visiting this link.

Harrow Road Police Station will go under Boris's plans

Harrow Road Police Station will go under Boris’s plans, as well

 

 

Boris quizzed over police cuts

The question and answer session comes at a time when the full extent of cuts to <city w:st=”on”><place w:st=”on”>London</place></city>’s emergency services has become clearer. In the past week the Mayor has confirmed which police and fire stations will be closed. A map outlining the extent of the cuts to emergency services across <city w:st=”on”><place w:st=”on”>London</place></city> has been compiled by Labour Group Leader Len Duvall AM.

The closures across the capital include: the loss of nine out of 32 A&E; cutting 12 fire stations, 18 fire engines and 560 fire-fighters; and the closure of 65 police front counters and stations.

The closures across <city w:st=”on”>Westminster</city> include: the loss <city w:st=”on”>Westminster</city>

Harrow Road

</street> and Marylebone police station.

Labour <place w:st=”on”><city w:st=”on”>London</city></place> Assembly Member Murad Qureshi said:

"We already know that <city w:st=”on”>Westminster</city> has lost 267 police officers in the last two years, but the Mayor’s plan confirms that the majority of <city w:st=”on”><place w:st=”on”>London</place></city>’s boroughs will have fewer police officers by 2015 than they did in 2010. All this is happening at a time when the London Fire Brigade and our Hospital Accident & Emergency Departments are also being cut back. This is further evidence that the Mayor and government are cutting too far, too fast and are hitting the frontline.”