Above is a video clip of Anjem Choudhury’s mob causing public disorder along the Edgware Road.   This is nothing new but this time it’s taken a very sinister anti-Shia form and my view is that there may be grounds for the police to bring charges of religiously aggravated harassment or sorts.

I am no Assad et al defender in the context of the present appalling situation in Syria but the language, messages displayed by the banners and the timing of the protest along the Edgware Rd conveys a very anti-Shia sentiment.

Quite honestly we can do without such intra-faith tensions on the streets of London particularly one as diverse as the Edgware Rd, where we have Sunni Arabs at the Marble Arch end and by the time you get to Kilburn it becomes Shia Iranian. The Edgware Rd has been home to a wide Muslim diaspora where different denominations of Islam live side by side in peace.  Long shall this remain without trouble makers like Anjem Choudhury’s lot stirring up religiously aggravated sentiments towards Shias.

Have you ever wondered while speeding through Chiswick on the Piccadilly line, why it doesn’t stop at Turnham Green tube except at very specific times?   It zips past 3 tube stops in Chiswick; Chiswick Park, Turnham Green & Stamford Brook- before reaching Hammersmith and beyond but more often than not misses out Turnham Green.  I’m sure many Chiswick folk have had these same thoughts, so I thought it was about time l got a response from the Mayor about the matter. So here it is.

I’m glad the Mayor agreed and has committed to a consultation because the issue has been around for decades, so I was pleasantly surprised that l managed to persuade him to take up the matter.  The Mayor is renowned for ignoring the finer detail of policy, but luckily, in this instance; it will be Transport for London (TfL) which will implement any change.   As far as l can see, if it can stop at Turnham Green at the beginning and end of the day, then operationally it must be possible to make stops during the day time also.

This said, TfL have not been great in Chiswick generally.  I recently had to write to them to get the subways under the A4 repaired and looked at over the summer after been approached by local residents with their concerns.  I also put in a petition to address pedestrian safety issues along the A4 raised by local residents around Barrowgate Rd at the last plenary for the political year 2012/13. So you expect a response from the Mayor and TfL in the Autumn.

So, if anyone else has any TFL related concerns in Chiswick, please don’t hesitate to contact me at murad.qureshi@london.gov.uk and I will do my very best to try and help move matters along.

Mayor of London Boris Johnson was today urged to properly fund the London Fire Brigade (LFB) and abandon his planned cuts. The call follows the Mayor’s decision to use his executive powers to force through the controversial closure of Westminster and Knightsbridge fire stations and eight others.  

On 18^th July the London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority (LFEPA) voted against the Mayor’s proposed cuts to 10 fire stations, 14 fire engines and 552 firefighters. 

Londonwide Assembly Member Murad Qureshi AM, said:

“We are now considering our next steps in light of the Mayor’s decision to force through fire stations closures, including Westminster and Knightsbridge fire stations. Londoners have been clear about their opposition to the Mayor’s closure of fire stations and we will continue to make the case to keep these stations open. The Mayor must reconsider his position, drop his plans to close 10 fire stations and fully fund the London Fire Brigade. 

“It is totally within Boris’ power to fully fund the London Fire Brigade. He is wrong to push through these fire station closures. If he is serious about ensuring the safety of Londoners he needs to put his money where his mouth is and provide adequate funding. While Boris continues to dither we have decided to take action and have instructed the Fire Authority to set up a working party to identify any further savings that will protect the frontline.” 

The stations that are due to close are: Belsize, Bow, Clerkenwell, Downham, Kingsland, Knightsbridge, Silvertown, Southwark, Westminster and Woolwich. 

The stations that will lose a fire engine are: Chingford, Hayes, Leyton, Leytonstone, Peckham and Whitechapel. 

Ends 

Notes 

1. Murad Qureshi AM is a Londonwide Assembly Member.

Londonwide Assembly Member Murad Qureshi AM today voted for a motion urging the Mayor of London to fully fund the London Fire Brigade to stop the closure of Westminster and Knightsbridge fire stations with the loss of 3 appliances across the two boroughs. The London Assembly voted to call on Boris to reconsider his proposals to close 10 fire stations and cut 14 fire engines and draw up measures that avoid the need for cuts to the fire service in London.  

Last week the Fire and Emergency Planning Authority (LFEPA) voted down the Mayor of London’s cuts agenda and put forward an amendment that the Mayor should fully fund the London Fire Brigade to keep the current provision of fire stations and engines. The Mayor is seeking advice as to whether he directs LFEPA to implement his cuts and disregard LFEPA’s decision. 

Local Labour Londonwide Assembly Member Murad Qureshi AM said:

“Boris has publicly said that more London Boroughs will meet the six minute average attendance time target, but this is not the case in Westminster and Kensington & Chelsea. At a local level, 38 wards will now miss the six minute average attendance time target as a result of the proposed cuts, while only 3 wards will move into the target time.

“Over 400,000 Londoners will now sit outside the target response time who previously lived in wards that met that time, while only 30,845 Londoners are now inside the target that previously were not.

“The Mayor must reconsider his position, drop his plans to close Westminster and Knightsbridge fire stations and fully fund the London Fire Brigade. We have seen an unprecedented level of engagement and response against Boris’s cuts to the London Fire Brigade. If he wants to, let the Mayor play with the fire but we are not prepared to sign up for this reckless plan.”

Ends

Notes

1. Murad Qureshi AM is a Labour London wide Assembly Member.
2. London Fire Brigade Cuts Motion, 24 July 2013:

Motion in the name of Fiona Twycross AM seconded by Valerie Shawcross AM:

This Assembly condemns the financial constraints being imposed on the London Fire Brigade by the Mayor that led to proposals to close fire stations and cut fire engines.

This Assembly therefore supports the decision by the London Fire & Emergency Planning Authority to reject the proposed cuts to the London Fire Brigade.  These cuts were rejected by:

• Over 1,300 Londoners who attended the 24 meetings
• The 21,770 Londoners who signed 13 petitions opposing the plans
• And 94% of the online consultation responses received by the London Fire Brigade

We call on the Mayor to provide the necessary funding to enable the London Fire & Emergency Planning Authority to maintain the front line response service that the population of this city demand.

Photo: Creative Commons License from Flickr – Exercise Forward Defensive 2012 (15) by kenjonbro, Taken on February 22, 2012

Boris Johnson has called for fracking in London, despite concerns about the environmental impact. I say Boris should focus on reducing the demand for energy and promote cleaner, greener sources of energy. As for drilling in London? No thanks Boris!

 In a letter to the Times newspaper, Boris Johnson wrote: “It is time for maximum boldness in energy supply. I fully support the Government’s drive for nuclear power, and if reserves of shale can be exploited in London we should leave no stone unturned, or unfracked, in the cause of keeping the lights on.”

Northdown Energy Limited are currently the only company within the M25 to hold licenses to explore for conventional oil and gas around the Croydon area. Current regulations allow them to explore for shale gas as well.

Boris is calling for fracking in London yet he has failed in reducing energy inefficiency through his RE:FIT and RE:NEW programmes. If these had been successful they would have been good for the environment and saved people money. He missed targets he set on domestic insulation, carbon emissions and electric cars.

Since Boris became mayor in 2008 the gap between London’s total carbon-reduction targets and actual reductions has widened significantly each year. Boris loves to jump on bandwagons and this is just his latest one – Londoners need a Mayor who considers their needs first ahead of commercial companies looking to make a quick profit at the potential, and as yet unknown, cost to the environment.

Fracking pads are large, lit at all times for safety reasons, noisy and dusty. If they were to go ahead in London, where does the mayor think a drilling rig can be accommodated? Boris should be promoting cleaner, greener sources of energy instead of ways to make Londoners lives harder.

At last weeks MQT,l got to ask the Mayor about whether he had any budgets for the replacements public access points taking the place of the closure of Police station front counters like that in Brentford.

It was quite clear he didn’t know as the exchange above well illustrates. As he is expecting London councils like Hounslow to pick up the revenue costs of renting space for these public access points along the high street. You would think the Met would readily pick up the running costs given the residents have lost their front counters.

Not surprisingly at the end of the MQT we were so dissappointed with his responses to our numerous questions we passed a motion saying his answers were inaccurate, evasive and ill-informed.

The Mayor in his recently released Vision 2020 s  spelt out how London’s further energy needs by stating it  would need six additional  sub-stations to respond to the energy gap in London.

This fits in well with the recent fears expressed by the regulator of the energy sector OFGEM that we could have “black outs” in the economy as  near as 2015 and the London Assembly’s Environment Committee  report outlining the energy gap in London to be in order of 11 per cent in December 2011, the difference between what we take from the national grid and what we actually supply into it.

As a result l asked him about it at todays plenary on his Vision 2020.  Please see video clip above to watch the exchange. 

More recently we find the Mayor writing in support of fracking in London in a letter to the Times ( date ) suggesting he is a recent convert to its cause.

The Observer this past weekend, highlighted the clients of Crosby in his firm Crosby Textor both in Australia and here in the UK, which include drinks industry interests and tobacco giants like Phillip Morris suggesting that in both instances links to government u turns on public policy positions like the government changing its minimum unit price for alcohol and ending branded cigarette packets.

His companies also lobby for Australian Petroleum Production & Exploration Association which promotes fracking.

Given the access he has had to the Mayor of London Boris Johnson, does this explain the Mayo’sr sudden adoption of fracking as the way out of the energy crunch in London?

http://oldblog.muradqureshi.com/fracking-hell-boris/

http://www.leftfootforward.org/2013/07/drilling-in-london-no-thanks-boris/

At today’s (Wednesday) Mayor’s Question Time Boris Johnson was challenged over new figures that reveal Westminster will see 68,228 people will now fall out of the target response time for the first fire engine to arrive at an incident. The new analysis also shows that 49,116 people will also have increased attendance times for the second fire engine.  

The Mayor is still pushing ahead to close 10 other fire stations including Westminster and Knightsbridge, cut 14 fire engines and 552 firefighters to pay for his 1penny a day council tax cut. 

The target response time for the first engine is 6minutes and the target for the second appliance is 8minutes. In the following wards in Westminster this is set increase for the first fire engine response time, moving them outside of the targets:

• Vincent Square will increase by 2 minutes 17 seconds
• Tachbrook will increase by 2 minutes 3 seconds
• Warwick will increase by 2 minutes 39 seconds
• Churchill will increase by 1 minute 14 seconds
• Abbey Road will increase by 38 seconds
• Knightsbridge and Belgravia will increase by 1 minute 52 seconds
• West End will increase by 32 seconds

 Local Labour London Assembly Member Murad Qureshi said:

“Boris Johnson’s cuts to the London Fire Brigade is going to see winners and losers and for 68,228 residents of Westminster they are going to be worse off. How is this fair? The public meeting in Westminster showed residents are fearful of the impact on safety cuts will have to where they live and work.

 “I fully support local residents who are challenging the Mayor’s reckless plans. Let’s hope he listens to our pleas on behalf of Londoners. 

“Nearly half of Londoners will fall outside the key six minute response time for the first fire engine to arrive. Boris is intent on pushing through his reckless plans to close ten other fire stations and cut 14 fire engines. He needs to listen to Londoners and drop his proposals. 94% of people who responded to the public consultation said they did not want these cuts and over 22,000 people have signed petitions against these cuts.” 

Notes

1. Murad Qureshi is a London Assembly Member. 
2. The attached tables show details of the wards that are currently within the target time of 6mins for the arrival of the first fire appliance but which, under the new proposals, will see their response time go above the 6min target time as well as wards that are currently within the target time of 8mins for the arrival of the second fire appliance but will see their response time go above 8mins under the new proposals.

Mayor backs Isle of Grain to the detriment of Heathrow

The Mayor of London Boris Johnson has ignored Hounslow’s reliance on Heathrow when he made his submission to the Sir Howard Davies’ Airport Commission today.  He’s clearly failed to take on board the views of residents in West London especially those in Hounslow, who have been very clear in saying they don’t want a bigger Heathrow but a better Heathrow and they certainly do not want to do away with it.

This morning at city Hall, Boris Johnson announced his support for a new hub airport in the Thames Estuary on the Isle of Grain on the Hoo Penisula in Kent, (0therwise known as the Foster Island not Boris Island).  He’s taken this stance, despite Heathrow employing over 70,000 people directly and indirectly many 10,000s of people in West London & the Thames Valley.

Hounslow Council recently undertook a borough-wide consultation and the results showed that the majority of residents did not want Heathrow to be expanded but they also didn’t want the airport to close.   According to Hounslow, over 11,000 Hounslow residents (around 10 per cent of its working population) are employed at Heathrow.

It’s disappointing that the Mayor has chosen to promote another one of his bizarre ideas contrary to the views of the people of Hounslow when making his submission to the Davies’ Commission. Boris hasn’t acknowledged Hounslow is the borough most affected by Heathrow in terms of noise and the economy and the recent consultation undertaken by the local authority reflected clearly the reliance residents have on Heathrow.  If Heathrow goes, West London would lose thousands of jobs, the Mayor should not underestimate the importance which this infrastructure has on resident’s lives and livelihoods.

Yes, residents are adversely affected by the noise from Heathrow and the consultation showed they want to see night flights banned, but they want to keep their jobs.  There are ways of achieving all of this for Hounslow residents with the use of more environmentally friendly aircraft and the implementation of better noise mitigation programmes.  It’s time the Mayor stopped putting his egoistic ideas before the views of residents who live and work around Heathrow.