Directly elected Mayor for the City of Westminster – Why not?

Cllr Barrow, leader of WCC – But who knows him? I suspect if he was a directly elected mayor people would know him

In last Friday’s Evening Standard my colleague Councillor Paul Dimoldenberg was quoted as saying that the City of Westminster leadership poll amongst the majority Tory group councillors as an insult to democracy

He is quite right to point out that a city which has some 250,000 inhabitants won’t have a say but the 48 Tory councillors in a ballot will at the end of the month, only one of whom opposed the discredited “nightlife tax ” policy. The latter showing quite well how out of touch the majority group was on this issue and why l feel the City needs to consider having a directly elected Mayor, as a means of reconnecting with residents again. What better mandate can you give someone then being directly elected by your residents as leader of the council then through the members of the majority political group in the council. Between elections it would then be up to the Mayor to keep in touch with locals in a way that a council leader does not have to do so.

In many ways the City of Westminster is unique in the governance of London similar to the City of London though much more credible in local government terms, having also the seat of government, monarchy and the vast majority of embassies based within its boundaries. Lets not also forget its residents, wildly diverse and  living in a host of urban villages like Pimilico, Marylebone, Paddington and Queens Park as well.

Interestingly on the 3rd of May, a number of local authorities are having ballots on whether to have a directly elected Mayors in their councils up and down the country with the full approval of the Department of Local Government & Communities (DLGC). Indeed we already have a number of councils in London which already have this arrangement including Newham, Lewisham and Hackney. So l say, if it can work for them why not the City of Westminster? 

More interestly in the Council’s Community Governance Review consultation, the option of a directly Elected Mayor is not put up as an option even though it is incorporated withn the Localism Act for 2011. I think its only right that those responding to this review with its extended deadline now till the 17th of February ask the council why this is the case and get some explanations?

What l am sure about, is that if we had a directly elected Mayor of the City of Westminster, it would be hotly contested. As it would have a profile like no other Mayor of a local authority in London, rubbing shoulders with royalty, diplomats and central government.

6 thoughts on “Directly elected Mayor for the City of Westminster – Why not?

    1. Murad

      Its got universal suffrages giving its cllrs creditability and not just a medivial business vote to some aldermens.

  1. product review

    You’ll for certain do not have something to lose
    with Adiphene, thus for those that actually need to slim while not
    losing their time and power, then Adiphene is that the product for you.

    The huge distinction between Adiphene and Adipex is that Adiphene is a product that
    uses a sequence of natural and secure to use ingredients.
    Different studies have demonstrated the profits of Ginseng Panax
    Root Extract.

    My website – product review

  2. Jalen

    I have several parked domains on my VPS that have been &#i126;wast8ng᾿ away. I decided to use Google’s “Adsense for Domains” and one of the options is to put the domain up for sale. If you choose this option, you have to give it a URL to send people to for info. When you do this, you can use a wildcard (*) to append the domain name at the end of a query string. With your post, I was able to put a template on my VPS that calls for a query string in several places which makes the website look customized to whatever domain people clicked in from. Thanks for your post!


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *