Jackson Vs Vince battle over future energy prices in UK

Last week Climate Change Committee advisors tells us ​​​​​​​to make electricity cheaper for consumers, so who has the best solution for this? Well we have two titans of the energy sector in the UK fighting over this one. In one corner, we have Greg Jackson, CEO of Octopus arguing for zoning pricing. In the other corner, we have another British green energy industrialist, Dale Vince who is the owner of the electricity company Ecotricity advocating breaking the link between gas prices and renewable energy. 

Dale Vince, argues that high UK energy prices are due to the current market mechanism that links the price of all electricity, including that from renewables, to the global price of fossil gas. He advocates for “breaking the link” between gas prices and renewable energy, believing it would lower energy bills. Vince argues that the current UK electricity market mechanism sets the price of all electricity based on the most expensive source, which is often imported fossil gas. This means even when wind and solar are abundant and cheap, the price is still tied to gas, leading to higher bills. Vince proposes “breaking the link” by ensuring that renewable energy sources, like wind and solar, are priced separately from gas, allowing their cheaper prices to be reflected in consumer bills. By separating the pricing, Vince believes it would lower energy bills for consumers, make green energy more competitive, and help the UK achieve its net-zero targets.

This while Greg Jackson advocates, zonal pricing which involves dividing the UK into
 
different electricity price zones, with wholesale prices reflecting the cost of generation
 
and transmission within each zone, varying by location based on local supply and
 
demand. He believes this system could save the UK billions annually by optimising
 
energy distribution and reducing waste. Jackson argues that the current system, which
 
uses a single national price, is inefficient and leads to wasted energy, particularly from
 
renewable sources located in specific areas like Scotland. He believes that zonal pricing
 
would thus incentivise the use of energy closer to where it’s generated, reducing the
 
need for expensive and inefficient long-distance transmission.  Octopus Energy has
 
claimed that zonal pricing could save the UK £3.7 billion per year, or £132 per customer,
 
by optimising the energy grid and has actively promoted zonal pricing, including
 
conducting survey and engaging with customers and policymakers on the issue. 
 
 
Yet despite the potential benefits, implementing zonal pricing is complex and may
 
require significant implementation challenges to the existing energy infrastructure.
 
Vince is critical of zonal energy pricing, a proposed alternative, believing it is complex,
 
unfair, and could slow the transition to green energy. Also while Vince advocates for
 
breaking the link, he acknowledges that various approaches can be explored to address
 
the issue as he estimates that the current system, where gas prices set the price of all
 
electricity, cost the UK £43 billion in 2023 alone, and could cost even more in the future.


Interestingly the House of Lords backs “zoning pricing” in a power market shake up whilst the CBI urges government to tackle energy costs as firms face £24 billion in extra costs and in particular the removal of policy costs (such as those related to net zero initiatives) from electricity bills, suggesting that these costs be funded through alternative mechanisms, such as general taxation.  So watch this critical battle, being played out over the summer.

 

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *