Author Archives: Murad

Olympic Stadium,West Ham 1 Tottenham 0

After hearing the news tonight that Olympic Park Legacy Company(OPLC) favours the West Ham bid against the Tottenham, l just hope for Newham residents sake, West Ham Utd don’t get relegated from the premiership! As the club will have great difficulty filling the ground without big fixtures like games against Man Utd, Chelsea, Arsenal and Liverpool.  
Unusually for the UK, this bid has been underwritten by the local authority arranging a £40 million loan with some suggestions concerns about how the decision has been made. Quite honestly the authorities should have waited till the end of the premiership season to know that reality.
 
If it does stand, West Ham Utd fans better get used to watching the game with binoculars!

Tube ticket office opening slashed in the City of Westminster

Changes to local stations:

Baker Street (Metropolitan) will only be open for 60 hours and 30 minutes a week (as opposed to 94 hours a week) 36% reduction

St John’s Wood will only be open for 67 hours and 15 minutes (as opposed to 97 hours and 30 minutes) 31% reduction

Warwick Avenue will only be open for 19 hours (as opposed to 90 hours) 79% reduction

Westbourne Park will only be open for 16 hours (as opposed to 69 hours and 30 minutes) 77% reduction

The changes come despite mayor Boris Johnson’s election promise to "defend local ticket offices" and "stop the planned ticket office closures". In his 2008 election manifesto, the mayor said he would ensure "there is always a manned ticket office at every station".

Across London opening hours are being cut by 30 per cent – or 5,290 hours a week.

Local Labour Assembly member Murad Qureshi said:

 "The mayor was elected on a clear promise to keep ticket offices open yet here he is cutting far more than anything that was planned before. Passengers will feel less safe and more vulnerable in the daytime and late at night as a direct consequence of the mayor’s broken promises."

Transport for All, a charity who campaign on behalf of disabled passengers, have warned that the changes will make stations even less accessible.

Transport trade unions say the cuts will turn stations into a "criminal’s paradise", making them more dangerous and leaving passengers – especially female passengers – more vulnerable to crime and anti-social behaviour. The TSSA union recently pointed to an assault which allegedly took place on an unmanned station.

TfL announced last March that 450 ticket office jobs would be cut as a result of the proposed changes. Negotiations over the job losses are on-going and one of the unions involved has accused the mayor of "jumping the gun" by pressing ahead with the ticket office cuts while the dispute is unresolved.

Ends

Notes

Murad Qureshi is a London wide Labour Assembly member and a former Councillor in the City of Westminster.

Further information about Boris Johnson’s cuts to ticket office opening hours is available here: http://www.tfl.gov.uk/corporate/projectsandschemes/16277.aspx

Boris Johnson’s manifesto promises on ticket office closures can be found on page two here

http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-files/Guardian/documents/2009/04/27/Transportmanifesto.pdf

For further information please contact Alison Marcroft on 0207 983 4363

Cameron’s attack on multiculturalism

One has to  respond to the British prime minister David Cameron’s assertion yesterday that multiculturalism was a failed policy.

He appeared to be echoing similar remarks made by German chancellor Angela Merkel last October in which she said Germany’s attempts to form a multicultural society have utterly failed. Cameron’s speech at the Munich Security Conference on the Feb 5 focused on the challenges posed to the UK by ‘home-grown’, British Islamic extremism and radicalisation. 

Yet while Merkel was at pains to underline that “Islam is part of Germany”, the British leader did not offer any such qualification in his comments. Nor did we  hear a similar condemnation of right-wing extremism from the PM. All this while many thousands of Londoners celebrated with the Chinese community the beginning of their new year in Central London. We did not hear him talking about this aspect of multiculturalism, its cultural and linguistic form but just its recent religious manifestation, largely in response to world affairs. In his attempt to curry favour with Merkel, he clearly picked on the Muslim communities of the UK.

It is also apparent the divisions within the Conservative Party about Islam and multiculturalism. On January 20, the party’s Muslim co-chairman Baroness Warsi expressed her views that it had become socially acceptable to be prejudiced against Muslims. Her fellow cabinet member, the secretary of state for education, Michael Gove, is meanwhile on record as saying: “Islamism [is] a totalitarian ideology [which turns to] hellish violence and oppression'”. So clearly in the cabinet, Gove has won the debate and got the ear of the PM and not Warsi.

Cameron’s speech in Germany also coincided with a demonstration in Luton in the UK by the newly-emergent far-right street protest group the English Defence League. The final insult is that the EDL supporters were quoting him as justification for their march.

Cyclists fear bike hire scheme is losing its way – TfL’s ‘wayfinding’ takes a few wrong turns in Fitzrovia

Yes, if maps attached to one of the city’s newest docking stations are anything to go by.

Bemused two-wheelers are up in arms after discovering that the latest bike bay to be built in Fitzrovia wrongly informs people that Soho is to the north and Fitzroy Square is to the west.  

A docking station in Warren Street is labelled Euston, and the maps – which are produced by TfL’s “wayfinding” organisation Legible London – appear to direct bike-users the wrong way down one-way streets. 

Linus Rees, a cyclist and chair of the Fitzrovia Neighbourhood Association, has catalogued a series of Boris bike “blunders” on the website of local paper Fitzrovia News. 

He said: “As anyone should know, Fitzrovia is the area bounded by Gower Street to the east and Great Portland Street to the west, and Euston Road to the north and Oxford Street to the south. 

“But it seems the folks at Transport for London and Legible London can’t find their way around as well as they should.”

Last year Labour London Assembly member and north Westminster resident Murad Qureshi criticised TfL for marking non-existent docking stations on its maps.

He said: “I have been particularly concerned about the delay in the roll-out of the final docking stations in the central zone, particularly in Westminster and Camden. 

“Getting the directions wrong in the map in Fitzrovia is perturbing and suggests the whole vision of the bike hire scheme isn’t quite going in the right direction either.”

Because one-way streets are not marked on Legible London’s maps, bike-users unfamiliar with London’s roads could unwittingly break the rules by taking what they believe to be the best route, said Mr Rees.

He added: “Westminster City Council fine people for going the wrong way down one-way streets, but they are directed that way by these maps.”

He has uploaded photographs of a bike restocking trailer parking on a pavement and another of a docking station labelled as being in Bloomsbury when it is actually in Fitzrovia.

Yesterday (Thursday) a TfL spokeswoman said signs would be corrected.

View full article here

Mayor must come clean on future of neighbourhood police teams

All 20 wards in the City of Westminster are each currently covered by a safer neighbourhood team (SNT) made up of a minimum of one sergeant, two police constables and three police community support officers. But reports from boroughs across London suggest that the make up of the teams could be changed.

Labour Assembly member Murad Qureshi said:

"Safer neighbourhood teams work well and are highly valued in the City of Westminster. But despite Boris Johnson’s promise to support them we’re getting mixed messages about their future. The Mayor must come clean and be honest with Londoners about the reality of his cuts and whether our team is safe."

In Merton it was reported last week that, "The Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Sir Paul Stephenson, and Kit Malthouse, London�s Deputy Mayor in charge of policing, are demanding borough police forces scrap the existing "one-two-three" structure where each SNT has one sergeant, two constables and three community support officers."

And on BBC London last night, it was reported that in the City of Westminster the police are proposing to merge 14 electoral wards in the north of the borough, each currently covered by six officers, into five bigger districts. "These proposals would result in a 50 per cent reduction in the number of sergeants, leaving those remaining responsible for policing a wider area", according to the BBC.

Acting Met commissioner Tim Godwin told the Metropolitan Police Authority (MPA) last week that the number of neighbourhood policing sergeants will be halved from 630 to 330 by the end of 2013.

Boris Johnson said in 2008, "I fully support the Safer Neighbourhood Team model, and I am committed to ensuring that there at least 6 officers in every ward." 

The MPA is currently reviewing safer neighbourhood teams and is due to report later this month.

Ends

Murad Qureshi is a London wide Assembly member and a former councillor in the City of Westminster.

For further information please contact Alison Marcroft on 020 7983 4363

City of London Corporation call for extra flights at Heathrow

Following so soon on the back of the Mayor’s new study on increasing airport capacity in and around London, the City of London Corporation (CoLC) through its latest report, argues (quite incredibly!) for an immediate increase in airport capacity at Heathrow by switching to the practice of “mixed mode” operations on the two runways.  This new practice would permit the use of the two runways for both take-offs and landings.   Currently each runway is restricted to one or the other.  This would immediately increase flight numbers from 480,000 to 525,000 flights annually and would, no doubt, be music to the ears of BAA, the operators of Heathrow although this concept is no stanger to BAA which already have in place similar concepts in the form of  TED (Tactically Enhanced Departures) and TEAM (Tactically Enhanced Arrivals Mode).  Typically the CoLC have ignored resident’s views on this despite the obvious extra aircraft noise this new practice would generate, particularly in the West London surburbs.  The Mayor’s study has clearly opened up the debate on aviation in London, so much so, that some, like the CoLC, feel confident enough to reignite debates which we all thought were finally  put to rest.  The  idea of Heathrow expansion is back again, this time in the guise of changing operations in order to accomodate new capacity.  It will only be a matter of time before someone, perhaps one of the Mayor’s business allies utilises this opening created by the Mayor’s report to argue the case for a third runway at Heathrow  yet again?

DEFRA v GLA: How NOT to improve Air Quality

 

Murad and Nicky Gavron with EU commissioner Potocnik during his visit to London last week

Last week, for the first time, we heard the Mayor’s office openly disagreeing with central government over the proposal in the Localism Bill (clause 30), to pass on EU fines to local public authorities like the GLA. Sir Simon Milton (Deputy Mayor and chief of staff to the Mayor of London) spoke during a parliamentary public bill Committee meeting on the Localism bill confirming the Mayor’s objection in principle to the concept of “delegating fines without also delegating the funds, resources and powers to take the steps necessary to avoid the fines” (column 51). While it was argued this would be grossly unfair for a variety of reasons, it also became apparent that central government and the Mayor’s office are proposing a different list of measures in order to bring the capital within the standards set. This lack of cohesion between the 2 simply adds to the confusion and turmoil surrounding the issue of air quality and fines. It is most regrettable, that we lack a solid game plan when we have such an important goal to achieve, which, ultimately, is to improve London’s air quality – Londoners’ biggest public health issue. The GLA and DEFRA can’t seem to agree what measures are needed in order to bring us below the EU targets and to achieve a time extension in which to comply. This is something I pointed out to EU Commissioner Potocnik commissioner last week when he passed through London. Clearly the government must think that some of the measures put forwarded by the GLA simply don’t stand up and therefore, it is not prepared to put these forward to the EU in support of a time extension? There is a need for unity and positive direction, because without this, Londoner’s health as well as their pockets are damaged. Unfortunately, there are likely to be more twists and turns in this sorry saga before we reach a satisfactory resolution.
 

What is the price of a decent nights sleep in London?

Yesterday l attended the launch of a study by Delft and sponsored by HACAN on a ban on night flights at the House of Commons. It placed an economic valuation of £860 million nationally of the benefit of having a complete night flight ban at Heathrow.  Most of this is associated with the monetary costs associated with sleep deprivation which outweigh any loss of income to the aviation industry.
While this is a national figure, the benefits almost completely accrue to London and in particular the noise contours around Heathrow airport. So we now know the price of a decent nights kip for Londoners throughout the year ….£ 860 million!

 

Mayor misled us on congestion charge

During the 2008 Mayoral election campaign, Boris Johnson assured Londoners that he would not increase the Congestion Charge above £8.  However, in December 2010 he increased the charge by 25% to £10 (£9 with autopay).  There was a clear and unequivocal commitment made by the Mayor during a televised Mayoral debate.  His exact words were that he ” would certainly not allow the congestion charge to go up above £8 which the (previous) mayor promised not to let happen before and then broke his promise as usual”
Even more hypocrisy was shown in his latest column in the Daily Telegraph last Monday where he complained about it costing him £ 80.54 to tank-up his Toyota car calling on his government address the plight of poor motorists.  I think the words “pot” and “black” spring to mind.
 

 

Boris’s estuary airport dream

Will it be Boris’s legacy to London or a fanciful dream without a hope in hell of taking off?  It was while he was a candidate for the Mayoral elections in 2008 that Johnson first stumbled across the idea of an airport in the Thames Estuary after reading a newspaper article.

When he became Mayor he set up a feasibility group to look at the possibility but after it was dubbed fantasy island and was condemned by David Cameron, the idea was dropped.

Last week, however, on the back of a report by the Mayor on the need for more aviation in London, Boris hinted it could be coming back, with a second report later this year pinpointing areas of interest for the super airport.

It led to London Chamber of Commerce and Industry leader Colin Stanbridge joking: "Some of us remember Judy Garland singing Somewhere Over The Rainbow and an estuary airport may end up there."

Boris though is not without supporters on the estuary scheme.

One of them is deputy chairman of Transport for London Daniel Moylan, who worked on the Mayor’s aviation report.

He said it would be of huge benefit to regeneration in the estuary area and that it could be twinned with plans to upgrade flood defences.

However, critics of the scheme look at its cost – possibly running to £40billion – while also pointing out that if there is such an urgent need for more aviation now, it’s better to increase existing infrastructure rather than go through at least 20 years of development.

Many give the scheme no chance of taking off and some, mainly environmentalists, believe it will be a disaster if it happens.

London Assembly member Labour’s Murad Qureshi was at the meeting last week. He is a strong believer an airport in the Thames Estuary cannot go ahead.

"There is no room," he said. "There’s a bird sanctuary protected under EU law inland so they have to go out to sea. Then there are shipping lanes and major constructions, such as wind farms.

"Yet he’s opened that door again after being put down by his party leader about it last year. I don’t understand."

It’s a view backed by the environmentalist lobby.

Chris Corrigan, of the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, said the estuary plans were a "pipe dream" that would cause major environmental damage and even create a major safety risk.

"It is home to an immense number of birds and other wildlife," he said. "You can not recreate the estuary nor move the native or migratory wildlife that relies on it for food and shelter.

"I’m sure the Mayor doesn’t want to go down in history as the man who decimated not just birds in the Thames, but global species too, while putting air passengers’ lives at risk due to bird strike."

As well as the risk of damaging the environment in the future, Qureshi said the plan could be of detriment now.

He insisted the mere hint of moving operations from Heathrow to a site off the coast could undermine the Crossrail scheme.

"If he’s seeking contributions for Crossrail while going through an exercise of shifting aviation to the Thames Estuary, it doesn’t make sense," he added.

"But the main point is that the Mayor hasn’t got any jurisdiction over those choppy waters let alone in the air over London."

View full article here