Author Archives: Murad

London Assembly calls on government to reverse decision to cut school sport funding

The cuts, announced in October’s Comprehensive Spending Review, spell the end for 450 school sport partnerships and have prompted a growing number of past, present and future British Olympians to sign a letter addressed to Prime Minister David Cameron.

Cameron has acknowledged the widespread disapproval and pledged a rethink although Education Secretary Michael Gove insists the government is not about to make a u-turn, even if the policy looks likely to be altered.

And today the London Assembly unanimously joined the ever-increasing number of those opposed to the cuts.

Murad Qureshi AM, who proposed today’s motion, said:  "With 2012 just around the corner, it is more important than ever that we maintain funding to schools and grassroots sports clubs to ensure a lasting legacy following the Games.

"More and more young people will be inspired to get involved in sports, but without the investment to back it up, we are in danger of missing out on a once in a life time opportunity.

"That’s why we’re calling on the Mayor and the Government to do all they can to protect funding for London’s grassroots sports facilities and recognise the incredible benefit they bring to young people and the community they live in."

Caroline Pidgeon AM, who seconded the motion, said: "The chance to take part in a range of school sports makes a real difference to young people growing up. helping them develop leadership skills, discipline and team working.

"School sports funding is about much more than all-weather pitches and gym equipment, it’s about building the skills that young people need in every aspect of their lives."

UK govt counter-terrorism efforts revealed in Bangladesh

Wikileaks shed new light on the UK governments involvement with a notorious batalion call the Rapid Action Battalion(RAB) in Bangladesh, with the guardian reporting it as UK involvement in deaths squads.  Its well known for its extrajudicial killings that its been carrying out for a number of years, using the term “crossfire” to explain away the hundreds that have been gunned down in a hail of bullets.  Critics call them government death squad and draw parallels with the UK government involvement with rendition flights in recent time.

The UK government has been involved in providing training particularly in investigative interviewing techniques and rules of engagement via British policemen. The justification for the UK government appears to be as a counter-terrorism measure. But to the best of the available knowledge around it has not been established yet that a terrorist threat exist from the shores of the Bay of Bengal, in the sameway as its been clearly done with the North-West Frontier of Pakistan and parts of Yemen and Somolia where Al-Qaeda operatives have been known to exist.  This maybe about to be broken by the present investigation of 9 suspects in the UK over an alleged christmas bombing, as its been suggested all of them are Bangladeshis. We will just have to wait and see on this front while some concerns have been expressed.

It has been clear for sometime that Jihadi islamist in Bangladesh are predominately pre-occupied with turning the Peoples Republic into a Islamic state. Thus posing a real threat to the Bangladesh government including the present incumbents, the Awami League and the previous caretaking regime, rather then attacks on other states like the UK.  The authorities have yet to show definitive evidence of the latter.

In the meantime, you can be sure of legal challenges both in the Dhaka Courts and here in the UK, particularly when civilan politicans are the victims of RAB activities like Salauddin Quader Choudhury MP. His is an opposition member of the BNP who has relatives in the UK to represent them. Once again the Guardian is reporting this well.

The challenge will be for the present government in Bangladesh to close down their operations given their election pledge to end extra judicial killings, in the mist of the violent Islamist threat while dealing with war crimes and mutineers. Yet for many in the Bangladeshi public there would appear to be support for them however unsavoury their actions, something that the US ambassador, Moriarty also suggested and got picked up in the wikileaks.

Whats in a name? Plenty

At the beginning of the christmas break, soon after the arrest of 9 terrorist suspects in the UK accused of planning christmas bomb attacks in London, l was asked to comment by journalists on them apparently being of Bangladeshi descent. I informed them that l we could not tell that till we had the 9 names of the suspects at least.   
 
When the names were released the one name that stood out was Gurukanth Desai  amongst the standard south asian muslim names. Now this name is a Gurajti Hindu one and you begin to wonder whats he doing in such company? Its either an indication that the police have badly got this wrong or that he’s recently converted and has yet to change his name. I trust we can get to the bottom of this one quickly.

Welcome U turn on School Sports Partnership but still not enough

A welcome U turn by the Education Secretary Michael Gove on his proposed cuts to the School Sports Partnership (SSP).  I’d like to think this decision is in part a response to my motion passed by a cross party of London Assembly Members at the last plenary meeting However, watch this space for the impact of changes on London which has 56 SSPs covering inner city areas like Tower Hamlets as well as the suburbs like Richmond.  The number of Londoners taking part in regular sport is actually falling so lets hope this is not just hot air so that the PM can pay lip service to the issue of sports funding in his olympic speech tonight, and that London is able to retain as many of its 56 SSPs as possible.

Guardian Diary re Offers from Boris to FIFA

How do reports that Boris Johnson retaliated against the alleged duplicity of Fifa boss Sepp Blatter by withdrawing an offer to put him up at the Dorchester during the 2012 Olympics square with his publicly expressed position? "What did you offer Fifa President Sepp Blatter to select England for the venue for the World Cup tournament in 2018," he was asked by London assembly member Murad Quershi at City Hall last month. "There has been no offer made to the Fifa president directly," replied the mayor then, sentiments echoed again on Monday yesterday. Hope that’s true. For questions are being asked. Blatter isn’t the only one being accused of trickery.

Young people wont just be losing their tuition fees

 

It is not often your old school hits the headlines as my old school, Quintin Kynaston, did last Friday.   However, the idea of a school having to provide shelter for it’s homeless pupils so that they may continue in further education illustrates well the direction in which the coalition government’s education policy is heading.

Appeals like the Quintin Kynaston House Project to raise £3m should not be necessary in this day and age.  Yet stories like these are not surprising, given the scrapping of the Education Maintenance Allowances (EMA).  This is the means tested allowance of £30 a week which makes it possible for a large number of students to stay on in education after 16. For example, in Brent, there were 3,684 young people receiving the EMA as at  November 2010.  From the 1st of January 2011, those students would no longer qualify.  The figure Londonwide is even more staggering at 84,814 who would stand to lose under the new changes.   This is why l joined campaigners over the weekend in Brent asking local people to sign a petition to their local MP, Sarah Teather, to keep her pre-election pledge against the rise in fees and to vote against scrapping the EMA.  I hope the government will listen.

So when all the attention is focused on higher education tuition fees this week, let’s not forget that young people will also lose the crucial stepping stone which for many, allows them to progress to higher education in the first place.  The loss of support for young people between 16-18 coupled with the removal of the cap for tuition fees constitutes a double blow for what is essentially our future hopefuls.

World Cup 2018, England not in contention at all.

Sunset falls on England Bid for World Cup 2018

It appears we really were not in it at all from the start, having been knocked out in the first round. So was it worth the Mayor of London really going given the transport gridlock most Londoners have had to suffer this week?

Clearly FIFA went for expansion of the game into new territories like Eastern Europe for 2018 via Russia and the Middle East via Qatar in 2022, after the success of South Africa. Rather then consolidating such expansion via established anchors like England. For the sake of the game l hope FIFA have not over extended themselves.

England World Cup bid but at what cost to Londoners?

 
The Mayor will be setting off to help the England bid for the 2018 World Cup and it would indeed be a major achievement to host it again, something which is long overdue on our shores.  In the meantime, I’ve been asking a number of questions about what it’s costing Londoners.  For example, I asked what the Mayor offered Sepp Blatter when he passed through City Hall on the 13th of October? and what liabilities had he agreed to behalf of London? However, as you’ll note from these links to my questions, the responses have been less then satisfactory.
 
I’ve been able to glean a better picture from other sources about the real cost to Londoners of bidding.  For example, the Mayoral approval of the London bid does not mention that there is a £250,000 payment to the FA as a host city contribution to the cost of promoting the bid to FIFA.  Further, in the event of being successful, it is also estimated that host city costs will amount to a sum in the region of £15m!  This is made up of the following estimated costs – fan fest sites of £2.9 m, live sites at £600k and other host city costs at £11.4m.  It is very surprising that other Cities like Derby and Plymouth have been able to quantify all of this but not the GLA in the Mayoral sign off of this decision.
 
Having also had a look now at a Host City Agreement, there are potentially many onerous conditions. Now don’t get me wrong, l’m very keen to see the World Cup brought to London, but l do think the Mayor should have been more open about these onerous conditions and the financial costs that local and regional government would have to bear, in particular, those on London Councils. The ones that stand out include logistical issues like transport, management and outdoor advertising, and not least FIFA being exempt from any local taxes! This on top of the host city having to underwrite all costs to fulfil its obligations as defined by FIFA which can be subject to change. Can you imagine, FIFA insisting that 24 hour drinking licenses be granted and that Heathrow stays open all night and that whilst ticket holders get free public transport on matchdays, the cost will fall on TFL (and thus Londoners) who will be receiving no extra revenue.  
 
Football is a global business and we have to be clear what we are incurring on behalf of all of our citizens and not just those of us who are footie fans.  We must remember that FIFA made some £3billion from the last World Cup in South Africa and therefore, is well placed to pick up the tab on behalf of local and regional goverment in the event that we are successful.  I trust (and hope!) that if we are signing up to the Host City Agreement at the end of the week, that all of these considerations are made clear.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
      
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 

With friends like this…

London Mayor Boris Johnson said he was “particularly pleased” with the coalition Government’s Comprehensive Spending Review announcement that the capital’s two big transport projects have
been saved – the upgrading of the London Underground and Crossrail.

However, like a malign conjuror, he distracts us and neglects to mention the swingeing cuts in policing, transport and housing which will hit middle-income earners in London and attack the poorest.

Some £6 billion in cuts in transport alone will mean axing step-free access across the tube network, the extension of the Docklands Light Railway and the upgrading of Croydon’s Tramlink. On top of this, in January, we will have a 7 per cent increase in tube and bus fares. So the Mayor’s claim that London has come out better then any other region from the CSR – all down to him, of course – rings hollow.

Since then, Boris has had his wings severely clipped by the Treasury, as grants to the London Development Agency have been cut to reflect the Government’s view that economic development should be national and quangos abolished.

This has substantially limited one of the primary purposes of the Mayor, enshrined in the GLA Act 1999, to promote economic development and wealth creation in London. While being in denial at first, he has since been busy writing to his “old school mates” in the Government and admitting to ministers that cuts to the LDA will mean “no budget” to promote London internationally for tourism and inward investment.

These cuts come in just as the capital needs to shine the most – during the 2012 Olympics, arguably the biggest international showcase a country can ask for – the shop was open but the shelves were empty. So much for banging London’s (and the country’s) drum.

Things look dire with all these broken promises. The Mayor and the Government’s commitment to East London job creation comes to an immediate halt with the ending of the Olympic employment and skills programme.

Add to this, whole chunks of the Mayor’s programme for reducing youth violence and support for at-risk young people will be cut. This means that jobs and opportunities will go.

Further, the Minister for the Department of Business Innovation and Skills has written to the Mayor to inform him that the Government will be abolishing the statutory role of the London Skills and Employment Board – something for which the previous Mayor, Ken Livingstone, fought tooth and nail.

Similarly, the Government’s proposals to devolve powers to the Mayor are strewn with hazards. Not surprisingly, it is devolving functions without the cash. It looks like Boris Johnson will get the royal parks with a much-reduced budget – reduced by at least 25 per cent.

This will put a lot of pressure on him to turn the royal parks into moneymaking venues and increase their commercial activities to run them. Bring on the baseball caps, candy floss and souvenir mugs. Talking of mugs…

With friends like this, who needs enemies?

Murad Qureshi is a Labour member of the London Assembly

To view article, click here

Channel 4 entertains Al-Muhajiroun again

Sensationalist Channel 4 do it again by giving Islamist, Anjem Choudary, an edition of the channels daily opinion slot known as 4thought.tv on the 5th of Dec.  Such stunts play right into the hands of anti-Muslim bigots, keen to promote Islam as a hostile and alien ideology.

 

There won’t be a chance to tell him he is deluded about the Khilafat when the Arabs are urging the US to bomb Iran confirmed in today’s Wikileak revelations.  Nor why he has not got a proper Muslim surname before he lectures us all.   And of course, does he enjoy getting beaten up by fellow Muslims whenever he tries to visit mosques uninvited?

It will get them cheap publicity by generating controversy but why should Channel 4 care about that !